Nicolas Jarry vs Jonas Forejtek — Tampere CH Round of 32

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Nicolas Jarry
CHI
Nicolas Jarry
#764ATP
1648ELO
1642Clay ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
clay
Jonas Forejtek
CZE
Jonas Forejtek
#312ATP
1387ELO
1364Clay ELO
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Jarry N.
6-7 6-3 6-3
Forejtek J.
Jarry N.
63662
Forejtek J.
77331

Nicolas Jarry defeated Jonas Forejtek 6-7 6-3 6-3 in the Tampere CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jarry N.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Forejtek J.

Forejtek J.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jarry N.Forejtek J.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.9
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jarry N.Forejtek J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
48
10
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
78
Break points won·Even
4
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
7
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jarry N.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Forejtek J.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.8+278 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.2Clay Elo 1364
7.8Overall Elo 1648
ELO gap
2.2Overall Elo 1387
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.9
Surface form
3.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
0.9
Minutes 14d
8.9
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Lehecka J.
Kicker N.
5-76-46-3
Semi-finals
Lehecka J.
Jacquet K.
6-36-0
Kicker N.
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
6-33-66-3
Quarter-finals
Lehecka J.
Virtanen O.
6-46-1
Kicker N.
Vilella Martinez M.[4]
7-666-0
Jacquet K.
Blancaneaux G.
6-36-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Popko D.[5]
6-47-60
R16
Blancaneaux G.
Erler A.
6-34-66-2
Jacquet K.
Kuzmanov D.
3-66-47-65
Lehecka J.
Jarry N.
6-46-4
Virtanen O.
Andreozzi G.[8]
6-26-4
Kicker N.
Muller A.[7]
6-43-66-2
Vilella Martinez M.[4]
Cachin P.
7-56-4
Popko D.[5]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Krstin P.
6-36-1
R32
Erler A.
Elias G.
6-43-67-5
Blancaneaux G.
Mena F.
6-47-5
Kuzmanov D.
Coppejans K.[6]
1-66-37-66
Lehecka J.
Hoang A.[3]
6-16-4
Jarry N.
Forejtek J.
6-736-36-3
Virtanen O.
Cazaux A.
3-67-656-2
Andreozzi G.[8]
Moraing M.
6-46-1
Kicker N.
Borg L.
6-36-0
Cachin P.
Bobrov B.
6-17-5
Vilella Martinez M.[4]
Domingues J.
4-67-657-5
Popko D.[5]
Luz O.
7-657-5
Arnaboldi A.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-16-4
Krstin P.
Aragone J.
6-46-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Bonadio R.
4-66-26-2
Muller A.[7]
Niklas Salminen P.
6-26-1
Jacquet K.
Oliveira G.
2-66-13-0