Facundo Bagnis vs Nicolas Jarry — Salzburg CH Semi-final

Salzburg CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
ARG4
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 July 2021
clay
Nicolas Jarry
CHI
Nicolas Jarry
#764ATP
1648ELO
1642Clay ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
Bagnis F.
6-4 6-4
Jarry N.
Bagnis F.
662
Jarry N.
440

Facundo Bagnis defeated Nicolas Jarry 6-4 6-4 in the Salzburg CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Nicolas Jarry came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Facundo Bagnis claimed a first win over Nicolas Jarry in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Facundo Bagnis edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-02-05QuitoR32clayNicolas Jarry6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(5)
2017-05-29Roland GarrosQ1clayNicolas Jarry5-2 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Jarry N.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Jarry N.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
68%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
34%
Break points saved·Even
62%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.5
9.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Jarry N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
54
48
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
98
Break points won·Dominant
35
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bagnis F.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Jarry N.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
4.3Clay Elo 1584
Surface ELO
5.7+58 Clay Elo edge
4.3Overall Elo 1591
ELO gap
5.7Overall Elo 1648
5.0
H2H
5.0
8.0
Surface form
4.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
3.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Bagnis F.[4]
Coria F.[3]
6-43-66-2
Semi-finals
Coria F.[3]
Londero J.
6-16-4
Bagnis F.[4]
Jarry N.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Londero J.
Cuevas P.[2]
6-36-0
Coria F.[3]
Rola B.
6-27-65
Bagnis F.[4]
Dzumhur D.
6-16-2
Jarry N.
Lehecka J.
7-666-4
R16
Cuevas P.[2]
Petrovic D.
6-16-4
Londero J.
Vatutin A.
6-02-66-0
Coria F.[3]
Huesler M.
6-14-66-4
Rola B.
Carballes Baena R.[5]
5-76-27-64
Dzumhur D.
Taberner C.[8]
7-626-756-2
Lehecka J.
Muller A.
6-26-4
Jarry N.
Heller P.
6-26-4
Bagnis F.[4]
Gaston H.
6-46-1
R32
Londero J.
Daniel T.[6]
6-46-4
Coria F.[3]
Melzer G.
6-36-4
Huesler M.
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Rola B.
Novak D.
7-57-64
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Neuchrist M.
6-44-66-4
Taberner C.[8]
Viola M.
6-46-4
Dzumhur D.
Mena F.
6-46-0
Gaston H.
Bachinger M.
6-46-3
Bagnis F.[4]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-2
Muller A.
Galan D.[7]
7-57-63
Lehecka J.
Aichhorn J.
6-46-3
Heller P.
Cerundolo F.
6-33-66-3
Petrovic D.
Gulbis E.
6-27-64
Vatutin A.
Erler A.
2-66-46-2
Cuevas P.[2]
Yevseyev D.
7-56-3
Jarry N.
Monteiro T.[1]
6-727-647-64