Tobias Kamke vs Jiri Vesely — Prostejov CH Round of 16

Prostejov CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GER
Tobias Kamke
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 June 2021
clay
CZE2
Jiri Vesely
#2142ATP
33 yrs · 198 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWWLL
Kamke T.
6-3 6-4
Vesely J.
Kamke T.
662
Vesely J.
340

Tobias Kamke defeated Jiri Vesely 6-3 6-4 in the Prostejov CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jiri Vesely came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Tobias Kamke closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kamke T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Vesely J.

Vesely J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kamke T.

Serve advantage — Vesely J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kamke T.Vesely J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.6
10.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (60 vs 173). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kamke T.Vesely J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
14
46
Break points saved·Dominant
69
95
Break points won·Clear edge
22
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
17
75
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
7
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kamke T.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Vesely J.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
3.0
Surface form
3.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
7.9
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Coria F.[4]
Molcan A.
7-616-3
Semi-finals
Coria F.[4]
Kolar Z.
6-46-2
Molcan A.
Mager G.[3]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Kolar Z.
Kamke T.
6-26-3
Coria F.[4]
Rola B.[8]
6-46-1
Mager G.[3]
Svrcina D.
6-36-2
Molcan A.
Dellien H.[5]
6-36-1
R16
Kolar Z.
Kopriva V.
6-37-63
Coria F.[4]
Kuznetsov A.
6-707-56-2
Rola B.[8]
Klein L.
6-43-67-66
Svrcina D.
Erler A.
6-17-5
Mager G.[3]
Baez S.
7-686-2
Dellien H.[5]
Vrbensky M.
6-16-2
Molcan A.
Watanuki Y.
6-16-2
Kamke T.
Vesely J.[2]
6-36-4
R32
Kamke T.
Mansouri S.
6-03-66-2
Kolar Z.
Miedler L.
6-26-2
Kopriva V.
Kovalik J.[6]
2-67-646-4
Coria F.[4]
Haerteis J.
6-16-0
Kuznetsov A.
Sels J.
6-07-64
Klein L.
Lehecka J.
7-57-5
Rola B.[8]
Rybakov A.
6-17-5
Svrcina D.
Bachinger M.
2-66-06-1
Baez S.
Siniakov D.
6-16-0
Mager G.[3]
Forejtek J.
6-36-3
Dellien H.[5]
Paulson A.
6-16-3
Vrbensky M.
Oliveira G.
6-32-66-4
Molcan A.
Poljak D.
6-36-3
Watanuki Y.
Andujar P.[1]
1-66-16-4
Vesely J.[2]
Mena F.
6-27-65
Erler A.
Cerundolo J.[7]
7-614-2