James Duckworth vs Adrian Mannarino — Stuttgart Round of 32

Stuttgart · ATP · Round of 32
James Duckworth
AUSQ
James Duckworth
#74ATP
1628ELO
1540Grass ELO
$485kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 June 2021
grass
Adrian Mannarino
FRA7
Adrian Mannarino
#49ATP
1673ELO
1653Grass ELO
$633kYTD
$15MCAREER
38 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLWW
Duckworth J.
6-3 6-2
Mannarino A.
Duckworth J.
662
Mannarino A.
320

James Duckworth defeated Adrian Mannarino 6-3 6-2 in the Stuttgart round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Adrian Mannarino came in ranked #49, leading the head-to-head 3–1. James Duckworth narrowed the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-07-14Los CabosR32hardJames Duckworth6-3 6-4
2024-02-05DallasQFhardAdrian Mannarino6-2 3-1 RET
2022-01-17Australian OpenR128hardAdrian Mannarino6-4 2-6 3-6 6-2 6-1
2016-07-11NewportR32grassAdrian Mannarino6-7(3) 7-6(5) 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Duckworth J.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Mannarino A.

Mannarino A.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Duckworth J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Duckworth J.Mannarino A.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
67%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.3
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Duckworth J.Mannarino A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
55
65
Break points saved·Even
97
96
Break points won·Dominant
4
66
Deciding sets·Slight edge
78
72
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Duckworth J.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Mannarino A.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
4.0Grass Elo 1540
Surface ELO
6.0+113 Grass Elo edge
4.8Overall Elo 1628
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1673
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
5.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 7
Fatigue & Travel
5.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
4.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
4.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Duckworth J.Mannarino A.
Freshness·Clear edge
89
77

Duckworth J.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Mannarino A.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 46 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cilic M.
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
7-626-3
Semi-finals
Cilic M.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-31-0
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
Querrey S.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
Humbert U.[6]
7-657-68
Querrey S.
Stricker D.
6-747-646-3
Rodionov J.[5]
De Minaur A.[4]
3-66-37-64
Cilic M.
Shapovalov D.[1]
7-57-63
R16
Stricker D.
Hurkacz H.[2]
7-657-65
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
Harris L.
6-37-64
Rodionov J.[5]
Gojowczyk P.
5-3
Querrey S.
Duckworth J.
6-47-67
Cilic M.
Basilashvili N.[3]
6-36-2
De Minaur A.[4]
Thompson J.
6-786-36-4
Shapovalov D.[1]
Lopez F.
6-26-726-3
Humbert U.[6]
Hanfmann Y.
7-696-2
R32
Basilashvili N.[3]
Brown D.
6-37-64
Hanfmann Y.
Chardy J.
6-46-4
Humbert U.[6]
Fucsovics M.
6-36-1
Stricker D.
Albot R.
7-647-65
Cilic M.
Molleker R.
7-56-3
Duckworth J.
Mannarino A.[7]
6-36-2
Harris L.
Simon G.
6-47-5
Gojowczyk P.
Ivashka I.
5-76-46-2
Rodionov J.[5]
Koepfer D.
2-66-36-2
Thompson J.
Pella G.
6-36-4
Lopez F.
Popyrin A.
6-46-4
Querrey S.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-1