Nicolas Jarry vs Nicolas Alvarez — Salinas 1 CH Round of 32

Salinas 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Nicolas Jarry
CHI
Nicolas Jarry
#764ATP
1648ELO
1574Hard ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 April 2021
hard
PER
Nicolas Alvarez
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWL
Jarry N.
6-1 6-1
Alvarez N.
Jarry N.
662
Alvarez N.
110

Nicolas Jarry defeated Nicolas Alvarez 6-1 6-1 in the Salinas 1 CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Nicolas Jarry came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Nicolas Jarry extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-09-17Davis Cup WG1 R1: CHI vs PERRRclayNicolas Jarry6-3 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Jarry N.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Alvarez N.

Alvarez N.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Serve advantage — Jarry N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jarry N.Alvarez N.
1st serve in·Even
65%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
59%
Return points won·Even
34%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.9
3.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 83). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jarry N.Alvarez N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
48
19
Break points saved·Dominant
98
38
Break points won·Slight edge
4
12
Deciding sets·Clear edge
57
38
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
79
68

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Jarry N.
Mejia N.
7-676-1
Semi-finals
Jarry N.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-56-3
Mejia N.
Celikbilek A.[6]
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Jarry N.
Tirante T.
7-636-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-46-4
Mejia N.
Barrios Vera T.[5]
2-66-17-63
Celikbilek A.[6]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-32-67-66
R16
Van Rijthoven T.
Dougaz A.
6-27-5
Tirante T.
King K.
6-16-2
Jarry N.
Sekiguchi S.
6-16-2
Menendez Maceiras A.
Eubanks C.[4]
7-666-1
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Sels J.
6-26-2
Mejia N.
Casanova H.
6-16-2
Celikbilek A.[6]
Ortega Olmedo R.
1-66-46-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Wang T.
6-16-1
R32
Tirante T.
Orlov V.
6-26-746-3
Sels J.
March C.
6-46-3
Mejia N.
Hidalgo D.
6-31-67-5
Casanova H.
Gomez E.[3]
6-43-66-2
Celikbilek A.[6]
Aragone J.
6-27-62
Ortega Olmedo R.
Chappell N.
6-36-2
Dougaz A.
Mansouri S.
6-26-2
Wang T.
Gengel M.
6-26-3
King K.
Tabilo A.[2]
3-66-46-1
Jarry N.
Alvarez N.
6-16-1
Eubanks C.[4]
De Jong J.
7-637-63
Sekiguchi S.
Moriya H.[7]
6-17-65
Van Rijthoven T.
Uchiyama Y.[1]
6-24-0
Menendez Maceiras A.
Uchida K.
6-46-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Quiroz R.[8]
4-66-17-67
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-26-2