Karen Khachanov vs Botic Van De Zandschulp — Great Ocean Road Open Quarter-final

Great Ocean Road Open · ATP · Quarter-final
Karen Khachanov
RUS2
Karen Khachanov
#22ATP
1828ELO
1783Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$23MCAREER
30 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 February 2021
hard
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#54ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Khachanov K.
6-7 7-5 6-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Khachanov K.
66762
Van De Zandschulp B.
78531

Karen Khachanov defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp 6-7 7-5 6-3 in the Great Ocean Road Open quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Karen Khachanov came in ranked #22. Karen Khachanov extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-05-10Rome MastersR32clayKaren Khachanov5-7 6-4 6-4
2023-02-27DubaiR32hardBotic Van De Zandschulp7-5 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Khachanov K.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Van De Zandschulp B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Khachanov K.

Serve advantage — Khachanov K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Khachanov K.Van De Zandschulp B.
61
Serve
41
39
Return
43

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Khachanov K.Van De Zandschulp B.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
47%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.5
5.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Khachanov K.Van De Zandschulp B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
86
77
Break points saved·Even
99
98
Break points won·Clear edge
81
68
Deciding sets·Slight edge
83
78
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
92
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Khachanov K.Van De Zandschulp B.
Freshness·Slight edge
80
89

Khachanov K.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Van De Zandschulp B.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sinner J.[4]
Travaglia S.
7-646-4
Semi-finals
Sinner J.[4]
Khachanov K.[2]
7-644-67-64
Travaglia S.
Monteiro T.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Monteiro T.
Thompson J.[11]
6-46-4
Sinner J.[4]
Kecmanovic M.[7]
7-6106-4
Travaglia S.
Hurkacz H.[3]
3-66-37-5
Khachanov K.[2]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-767-56-3
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.
Opelka R.[6]
7-667-64
Khachanov K.[2]
Anderson K.
6-37-65
Kecmanovic M.[7]
Caruso S.
7-655-77-5
Travaglia S.
Bublik A.[8]
6-17-5
Hurkacz H.[3]
Cuevas P.
7-57-5
Thompson J.[11]
Vilella Martinez M.
6-46-4
Monteiro T.
Alcaraz C.
7-636-3
Sinner J.[4]
Bedene A.[13]
7-666-2
R32
Bublik A.[8]
Oconnell C.
7-626-766-4
Khachanov K.[2]
Purcell M.
7-656-3
Vilella Martinez M.
Basilashvili N.[5]
7-56-3
Monteiro T.
Ebden M.
6-746-46-3
Thompson J.[11]
Herbert P.
6-43-66-3
Anderson K.
Stebe C.
6-46-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Majchrzak K.
6-43-66-4
Opelka R.[6]
Stakhovsky S.
7-686-4
Sinner J.[4]
Vukic A.
6-26-4
Bedene A.[13]
Sweeny D.
6-06-4
Kecmanovic M.[7]
Kwon S.
6-36-4
Travaglia S.
Querrey S.[10]
6-776-36-4
Cuevas P.
Haase R.
7-56-3
Alcaraz C.
Goffin D.[1]
6-36-3
Caruso S.
Sandgren T.[9]
6-46-726-1
Hurkacz H.[3]
Torpegaard M.
6-46-3
R64
Bedene A.[13]
Uchiyama Y.
7-657-65
Caruso S.
Seppi A.
7-57-65
Alcaraz C.
Balazs A.
2-2
Vukic A.
Lu Y.
6-47-5
Stebe C.
Dellien H.
6-46-4
Herbert P.
Cressy M.
6-727-627-5
Vilella Martinez M.
Hanfmann Y.
7-626-4
Sweeny D.
Nam J.
7-647-5
Purcell M.
Gombos N.
6-46-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Schoolkate T.
6-47-5
Stakhovsky S.
Safiullin R.
6-756-46-3
Kwon S.
Martin A.
6-36-757-64
Oconnell C.
Koepfer D.
5-76-46-1
Travaglia S.
Carballes Baena R.
2-67-57-62
Querrey S.[10]
Laaksonen H.
4-67-656-0
Monteiro T.
Fancutt T.
6-46-4
Ebden M.
Delbonis F.
6-37-66
Cuevas P.
Andujar P.[14]
6-46-2
Torpegaard M.
Martinez P.
6-47-5
Haase R.
Coppejans K.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[11]
Mager G.
4-66-46-3
Majchrzak K.
Djere L.[12]
6-36-4
Sandgren T.[9]
Smith J.
6-35-76-4
Anderson K.
Lopez F.[16]
6-47-5