Tomas Machac vs Francisco Cerundolo — Prague CH Round of 64

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1783Clay ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 August 2020
clay
Francisco Cerundolo
ARG
Francisco Cerundolo
#22ATP
1931ELO
1868Clay ELO
$1.9MYTD
$11MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLWWL
Machac T.
6-2 4-6 6-0
Cerundolo F.
Machac T.
6462
Cerundolo F.
2601

Tomas Machac defeated Francisco Cerundolo 6-2 4-6 6-0 in the Prague CH round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Francisco Cerundolo came in ranked #22. Tomas Machac extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-04-05Monte Carlo MastersR32clayTomas Machac7-6(2) 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Cerundolo F.

Cerundolo F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Machac T.Cerundolo F.
12
Serve
26
48
Return
99

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Cerundolo F.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.0
3.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Cerundolo F.
Clutch Rating·Even
90
88
Break points saved·Even
98
98
Break points won·Slight edge
80
86
Deciding sets·Even
94
94
Tiebreaks·Even
97
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Machac T.Cerundolo F.
Freshness·
—
98

Cerundolo F.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Wawrinka S.[1]
Karatsev A.
7-626-4
Karatsev A.
Griekspoor T.
6-47-66
Semi-finals
Karatsev A.
Herbert P.[3]
7-57-67
Wawrinka S.[1]
Vrbensky M.
5-76-36-3
Griekspoor T.
Rosol L.
6-47-5
Karatsev A.
Popko D.[16]
7-54-67-5
Quarter-finals
Karatsev A.
Laaksonen H.[7]
7-636-4
Herbert P.[3]
Griekspoor T.
7-55-76-3
Vrbensky M.
Ymer E.
6-23-66-4
Wawrinka S.[1]
Nagal S.[6]
2-66-06-1
Karatsev A.
Wawrinka S.[1]
W/O
Rosol L.
Ofner S.[9]
6-35-77-5
Griekspoor T.
Haase R.[13]
6-36-2
Popko D.[16]
Rinderknech A.[7]
0-67-616-3
R16
Vrbensky M.
Kohlschreiber P.[4]
W/O
Karatsev A.
Gulbis E.[14]
6-36-3
Laaksonen H.[7]
Maden Y.[10]
3-66-46-3
Herbert P.[3]
Kolar Z.
7-632-66-3
Griekspoor T.
Kovalik J.[5]
6-11-66-1
Ymer E.
Machac T.
4-66-36-0
Nagal S.[6]
Lehecka J.
5-77-646-3
Wawrinka S.[1]
Otte O.
3-67-56-1
Griekspoor T.
Stakhovsky S.[12]
6-16-1
Rosol L.
Herbert P.[2]
6-7106-36-4
Ofner S.[9]
Olivo R.
4-67-656-4
Haase R.[13]
Kolar Z.
6-36-2
Rinderknech A.[7]
Masur D.
6-36-3
Popko D.[16]
Maden Y.[4]
7-56-1
Karatsev A.
Gulbis E.[8]
6-26-1
Wawrinka S.[1]
Van De Zandschulp B.[15]
6-36-3
R32
Nagal S.[6]
Clarke J.
6-35-74-1
Herbert P.[3]
Forejtek J.
2-66-46-3
Otte O.
Rinderknech A.[13]
6-26-3
Maden Y.[10]
De Greef A.
6-36-4
Machac T.
Ivashka I.[8]
6-07-5
Kovalik J.[5]
Menendez Maceiras A.
4-66-16-2
Karatsev A.
Vesely J.[2]
6-36-4
Gulbis E.[14]
Paulson A.
7-55-76-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Satral J.
6-33-67-5
Kolar Z.
Ofner S.[15]
7-677-5
Griekspoor T.
Coppejans K.[11]
5-76-46-3
Ymer E.
Klizan M.[12]
6-22-66-2
Vrbensky M.
Diez S.[16]
7-56-3
Kohlschreiber P.[4]
Moraing M.
6-17-63
Lehecka J.
Rola B.[9]
6-47-64
Wawrinka S.[1]
Safiullin R.
6-14-66-1
Rosol L.
Horansky F.[14]
4-66-26-4
Ofner S.[9]
Forejtek J.
1-67-676-2
Herbert P.[2]
Bemelmans R.
6-26-2
Olivo R.
Klizan M.[6]
6-47-5
Kolar Z.
Chung H.[3]
6-36-1
Haase R.[13]
Machac T.
6-36-4
Stakhovsky S.[12]
Ferreira Silva F.
2-67-647-65
Griekspoor T.
Coppejans K.[5]
7-636-3
Rinderknech A.[7]
Grenier H.
6-46-1
Masur D.
Clarke J.[11]
7-656-1
Popko D.[16]
Otte O.
7-56-3
Maden Y.[4]
Vrbensky M.
6-32-66-4
Gulbis E.[8]
Ymer E.
6-22-66-4
Karatsev A.
Diez S.[10]
6-16-2
Van De Zandschulp B.[15]
Gengel M.
6-36-2
Wawrinka S.[1]
Oliveira G.
6-36-4
R64
Griekspoor T.
Kuznetsov A.
7-647-65
Menendez Maceiras A.
Molleker R.
7-646-3
De Greef A.
Couacaud E.
6-26-0
Machac T.
Stakhovsky S.
7-56-2
Satral J.
Bemelmans R.
7-57-5
Karatsev A.
Haase R.
6-46-2
Paulson A.
Horansky F.
6-32-66-3
Forejtek J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-42-66-4
Kolar Z.
Nouza P.
6-26-1
Ymer E.
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-4
Vrbensky M.
Masur D.
7-57-5
Moraing M.
Vatutin A.
5-76-36-2
Clarke J.
Popko D.
7-633-66-3
Lehecka J.
Kuhn N.
6-36-3
Otte O.
Jaziri M.
6-46-0
Safiullin R.
Rosol L.
7-56-2
Vrbensky M.
Krstin P.
6-16-3
Forejtek J.
Vatutin A.
6-46-2
Bemelmans R.
Benchetrit E.
7-56-2
Kolar Z.
De Greef A.
6-46-1
Machac T.
Cerundolo F.
6-24-66-0
Rosol L.
Molleker R.
6-36-747-5
Olivo R.
Robredo T.
4-66-46-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Karlovskiy E.
6-27-5
Griekspoor T.
Klein L.
6-47-65
Grenier H.
Safiullin R.
6-47-64
Masur D.
Lehecka J.
4-66-37-62
Otte O.
Muller A.
6-26-3
Ymer E.
Janvier M.
6-37-64
Karatsev A.
Couacaud E.
3-67-57-5
Gengel M.
Gabashvili T.
6-27-61
Oliveira G.
Jaziri M.
6-46-4