Elias Ymer vs Tomas Machac — Prague CH Round of 16

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Elias Ymer
SWE
Elias Ymer
#183ATP
1548ELO
1492Clay ELO
$191kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 August 2020
clay
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1783Clay ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Ymer E.
4-6 6-3 6-0
Machac T.
Ymer E.
4662
Machac T.
6301

Elias Ymer defeated Tomas Machac 4-6 6-3 6-0 in the Prague CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #53. Elias Ymer extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-26DubaiQ1hardTomas Machac6-1 7-5
2023-05-08Rome MastersQ1clayElias Ymer1-6 6-2 7-6(4)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Ymer E.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Machac T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ymer E.

Serve advantage — Machac T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ymer E.Machac T.
—
Serve
12
—
Return
48

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ymer E.Machac T.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
54%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Even
4.7
5.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ymer E.Machac T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
48
90
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
98
Break points won·Dominant
23
80
Deciding sets·Clear edge
78
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ymer E.Machac T.
Freshness·
100
—

Ymer E.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Wawrinka S.[1]
Karatsev A.
7-626-4
Karatsev A.
Griekspoor T.
6-47-66
Semi-finals
Karatsev A.
Herbert P.[3]
7-57-67
Wawrinka S.[1]
Vrbensky M.
5-76-36-3
Griekspoor T.
Rosol L.
6-47-5
Karatsev A.
Popko D.[16]
7-54-67-5
Quarter-finals
Karatsev A.
Laaksonen H.[7]
7-636-4
Herbert P.[3]
Griekspoor T.
7-55-76-3
Vrbensky M.
Ymer E.
6-23-66-4
Wawrinka S.[1]
Nagal S.[6]
2-66-06-1
Karatsev A.
Wawrinka S.[1]
W/O
Rosol L.
Ofner S.[9]
6-35-77-5
Griekspoor T.
Haase R.[13]
6-36-2
Popko D.[16]
Rinderknech A.[7]
0-67-616-3
R16
Vrbensky M.
Kohlschreiber P.[4]
W/O
Karatsev A.
Gulbis E.[14]
6-36-3
Laaksonen H.[7]
Maden Y.[10]
3-66-46-3
Herbert P.[3]
Kolar Z.
7-632-66-3
Griekspoor T.
Kovalik J.[5]
6-11-66-1
Ymer E.
Machac T.
4-66-36-0
Nagal S.[6]
Lehecka J.
5-77-646-3
Wawrinka S.[1]
Otte O.
3-67-56-1
Griekspoor T.
Stakhovsky S.[12]
6-16-1
Rosol L.
Herbert P.[2]
6-7106-36-4
Ofner S.[9]
Olivo R.
4-67-656-4
Haase R.[13]
Kolar Z.
6-36-2
Rinderknech A.[7]
Masur D.
6-36-3
Popko D.[16]
Maden Y.[4]
7-56-1
Karatsev A.
Gulbis E.[8]
6-26-1
Wawrinka S.[1]
Van De Zandschulp B.[15]
6-36-3
R32
Nagal S.[6]
Clarke J.
6-35-74-1
Herbert P.[3]
Forejtek J.
2-66-46-3
Otte O.
Rinderknech A.[13]
6-26-3
Maden Y.[10]
De Greef A.
6-36-4
Machac T.
Ivashka I.[8]
6-07-5
Kovalik J.[5]
Menendez Maceiras A.
4-66-16-2
Karatsev A.
Vesely J.[2]
6-36-4
Gulbis E.[14]
Paulson A.
7-55-76-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Satral J.
6-33-67-5
Kolar Z.
Ofner S.[15]
7-677-5
Griekspoor T.
Coppejans K.[11]
5-76-46-3
Ymer E.
Klizan M.[12]
6-22-66-2
Vrbensky M.
Diez S.[16]
7-56-3
Kohlschreiber P.[4]
Moraing M.
6-17-63
Lehecka J.
Rola B.[9]
6-47-64
Wawrinka S.[1]
Safiullin R.
6-14-66-1
Rosol L.
Horansky F.[14]
4-66-26-4
Ofner S.[9]
Forejtek J.
1-67-676-2
Herbert P.[2]
Bemelmans R.
6-26-2
Olivo R.
Klizan M.[6]
6-47-5
Kolar Z.
Chung H.[3]
6-36-1
Haase R.[13]
Machac T.
6-36-4
Stakhovsky S.[12]
Ferreira Silva F.
2-67-647-65
Griekspoor T.
Coppejans K.[5]
7-636-3
Rinderknech A.[7]
Grenier H.
6-46-1
Masur D.
Clarke J.[11]
7-656-1
Popko D.[16]
Otte O.
7-56-3
Maden Y.[4]
Vrbensky M.
6-32-66-4
Gulbis E.[8]
Ymer E.
6-22-66-4
Karatsev A.
Diez S.[10]
6-16-2
Van De Zandschulp B.[15]
Gengel M.
6-36-2
Wawrinka S.[1]
Oliveira G.
6-36-4
R64
Griekspoor T.
Kuznetsov A.
7-647-65
Menendez Maceiras A.
Molleker R.
7-646-3
De Greef A.
Couacaud E.
6-26-0
Machac T.
Stakhovsky S.
7-56-2
Satral J.
Bemelmans R.
7-57-5
Karatsev A.
Haase R.
6-46-2
Paulson A.
Horansky F.
6-32-66-3
Forejtek J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-42-66-4
Kolar Z.
Nouza P.
6-26-1
Ymer E.
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-4
Vrbensky M.
Masur D.
7-57-5
Moraing M.
Vatutin A.
5-76-36-2
Clarke J.
Popko D.
7-633-66-3
Lehecka J.
Kuhn N.
6-36-3
Otte O.
Jaziri M.
6-46-0
Safiullin R.
Rosol L.
7-56-2
Vrbensky M.
Krstin P.
6-16-3
Forejtek J.
Vatutin A.
6-46-2
Bemelmans R.
Benchetrit E.
7-56-2
Kolar Z.
De Greef A.
6-46-1
Machac T.
Cerundolo F.
6-24-66-0
Rosol L.
Molleker R.
6-36-747-5
Olivo R.
Robredo T.
4-66-46-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Karlovskiy E.
6-27-5
Griekspoor T.
Klein L.
6-47-65
Grenier H.
Safiullin R.
6-47-64
Masur D.
Lehecka J.
4-66-37-62
Otte O.
Muller A.
6-26-3
Ymer E.
Janvier M.
6-37-64
Karatsev A.
Couacaud E.
3-67-57-5
Gengel M.
Gabashvili T.
6-27-61
Oliveira G.
Jaziri M.
6-46-4