Elias Ymer vs Tomas Machac — Rome Masters Qualifying Round 1

Rome Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
SWE
Elias Ymer
#191ATP
1570ELO
1515Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 May 2023
clay
CZE
Tomas Machac
[16]
#43ATP
1862ELO
1777Clay ELO
$681kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW

Elias Ymer defeated Tomas Machac 1-6 6-2 7-6 in the Rome Masters qualifying round 1 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #43, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Elias Ymer claimed a first win over Tomas Machac in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ymer E.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Machac T.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.0Clay Elo 1515
Surface ELO
8.0+262 Clay Elo edge
1.5Overall Elo 1570
ELO gap
8.5Overall Elo 1862
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.2
Surface form
6.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
8.3
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Ymer E.
16772
Machac T.
62641

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
0.68
SlowFast
Weather
19°COvercast
Wind 10 km/hHumidity 72%

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-26DubaiQ1hardTomas Machac6-1 7-5
View full head-to-head →

Statistics

Recent form
Ymer E.Machac T.
60%1st serve in+3%63%
73%1st serve points won+4%69%
50%2nd serve points won+2%52%
64%Service points won+2%62%
35%Return points won+2%37%
63%Break points saved+3%60%
5Aces / match+0.15.1
2.7Double faults / match+0.22.5

Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Draw — qualifying

Q2
Hanfmann Y.[9]
Grenier H.[18]
6-46-4
Kokkinakis T.[12]
Choinski J.
6-26-2
Altmaier D.[2]
Ymer E.
7-656-0
Napolitano S.
Marterer M.
4-67-57-5
Popyrin A.[1]
Pellegrino A.
6-07-63
Martinez P.[23]
Maestrelli F.
6-06-2
Safiullin R.[13]
Kopriva V.
6-27-63
Marozsan F.[21]
Meligeni Alves F.
7-56-1
Cobolli F.
Nava E.
4-67-647-5
Cerundolo J.[7]
Barrios Vera T.[20]
6-36-1
Fils A.[17]
Shevchenko A.[4]
6-36-4
Muller A.[3]
Agamenone F.
6-06-1
Q1
Safiullin R.[13]
Sousa J.
6-16-3
Cerundolo J.[7]
Sels J.
6-26-2
Cobolli F.
Basilashvili N.[22]
5-2
Pellegrino A.
Brancaccio R.[24]
6-30-66-3
Marozsan F.[21]
Skatov T.
6-02-67-5
Martinez P.[23]
Vavassori A.
6-25-76-2
Shevchenko A.[4]
Krutykh O.
6-46-2
Meligeni Alves F.
Gojo B.[11]
7-656-3
Popyrin A.[1]
Bonadio R.
6-44-66-3
Kokkinakis T.[12]
Gigante M.
7-56-3
Barrios Vera T.[20]
Bellucci M.
7-646-0
Hanfmann Y.[9]
Ocleppo J.
6-47-63
Nava E.
Daniel T.[10]
0-66-26-4
Kopriva V.
Galan D.[6]
7-623-67-61
Marterer M.
Ugo Carabelli C.[19]
6-37-66
Altmaier D.[2]
Kovalik J.
6-26-4
Grenier H.[18]
Collarini A.
6-35-76-2
Maestrelli F.
Zhang Z.[5]
7-52-67-5
Choinski J.
Rodionov J.[15]
2-66-16-2
Agamenone F.
Virtanen O.[14]
4-66-16-2
Fils A.[17]
Peniston R.
6-24-67-64
Napolitano S.
Kovacevic A.[8]
6-46-3
Ymer E.
Machac T.[16]
1-66-27-64
Muller A.[3]
Ferrari G.
2-67-646-4