Roman Safiullin vs Botic Van De Zandschulp — Nur-Sultan CH Round of 16

Nur-Sultan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Roman Safiullin
RUS11
Roman Safiullin
#96ATP
1750ELO
1704Hard ELO
$199kYTD
$4.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 March 2020
hard
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED8
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Safiullin R.
6-3 4-6 6-0
Van De Zandschulp B.
Safiullin R.
6462
Van De Zandschulp B.
3601

Roman Safiullin defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp 6-3 4-6 6-0 in the Nur-Sultan CH round of 16 on hard. Roman Safiullin extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-07-01WimbledonR64grassRoman Safiullin6-0 4-6 6-3 3-6 7.10-6.5

Serve vs return

This season
Safiullin R.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Van De Zandschulp B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Safiullin R.

Serve advantage — Safiullin R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Safiullin R.Van De Zandschulp B.
—
Serve
41
—
Return
44

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Safiullin R.Van De Zandschulp B.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.4
5.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Safiullin R.Van De Zandschulp B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
68
77
Break points saved·Even
96
98
Break points won·Clear edge
44
68
Deciding sets·Even
76
79
Tiebreaks·Even
78
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Safiullin R.Van De Zandschulp B.
Freshness·Slight edge
84
95

Safiullin R.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Van De Zandschulp B.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

R16
Griekspoor T.[13]
Safwat M.[1]
6-17-68
De Jong J.
Torpegaard M.[6]
W/O
Karatsev A.
De Greef A.
6-12-0
Safiullin R.[11]
Van De Zandschulp B.[8]
6-34-66-0
Coppejans K.[3]
Ymer E.[14]
7-641-66-2
Marchenko I.[15]
Zakharov A.
7-57-62
Zapata Miralles B.[16]
Rodionov J.[4]
6-26-2
R32
Zakharov A.
Maden Y.[2]
W/O
Marchenko I.[15]
Fayziev S.
6-16-4
De Jong J.
Ramanathan R.[10]
6-26-2
Torpegaard M.[6]
Yevseyev D.
6-17-67
Coppejans K.[3]
Klein L.
3-66-46-1
Ymer E.[14]
Walkow S.
6-17-67
Karatsev A.
Haase R.[5]
7-656-1
Zapata Miralles B.[16]
Durasovic V.
6-16-4
Rodionov J.[4]
Kamke T.
6-37-63
Safiullin R.[11]
Nedovyesov A.
W/O
De Greef A.
Ferreira Silva F.[12]
4-0
Moraing M.
Couacaud E.[9]
W/O
Griekspoor T.[13]
Serdarusic N.
6-37-65
Safwat M.[1]
Lomakin G.
6-26-4
Kotov P.
Popko D.[7]
6-37-64
Van De Zandschulp B.[8]
Freund S.
6-27-5
R64
Serdarusic N.
Bulitski A.
6-26-2
Freund S.
Khabibulin T.
3-67-636-3
Klein L.
Galfinger R.
6-06-1
Nedovyesov A.
Maulenov T.
6-26-2
Karatsev A.
Machac T.
6-726-46-3
Kamke T.
Usipbekov B.
6-16-0
Moraing M.
Vrbensky M.
6-36-3
Lomakin G.
Ayap S.
5-76-16-2
Kotov P.
Tashbulatov D.
6-46-2
Walkow S.
Elgin M.
6-36-1
Fayziev S.
Zimonjic N.
6-17-66
De Greef A.
Molcan A.
6-22-66-2
Durasovic V.
Golubev A.
7-636-4
De Jong J.
Petrenko A.
6-06-2
Yevseyev D.
Kravchuk K.
6-46-4