Tommy Paul vs Emilio Gomez — Tiburon CH Semi-final

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Tommy Paul
USA1
Tommy Paul
#24ATP
1949ELO
1881Hard ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 September 2019
hard
ECU4
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Paul T.
6-1 7-6
Gomez E.
Paul T.
6772
Gomez E.
1650

Tommy Paul defeated Emilio Gomez 6-1 7-6 in the Tiburon CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Tommy Paul came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's quarter-final. Tommy Paul extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Tommy Paul came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-02-27AcapulcoR32hardTommy Paul6-1 7-6(4)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Paul T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Serve advantage — Paul T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Paul T.Gomez E.
71
Serve
—
54
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Paul T.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.1
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paul T.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
93
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
77
Break points won·Dominant
87
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
23
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
96
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Paul T.Gomez E.
Freshness·
88
—

Paul T.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Paul T.[1]
Kokkinakis T.[8]
7-56-736-4
Semi-finals
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Kwiatkowski T.[14]
2-66-26-1
Paul T.[1]
Gomez E.[4]
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Cressy M.[16]
6-46-2
Kwiatkowski T.[14]
Nakashima B.
7-51-67-66
Gomez E.[4]
Bangoura S.
6-31-66-2
Paul T.[1]
Escobar G.
6-41-67-62
R16
Cressy M.[16]
Quiroz R.
5-76-26-3
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Couacaud E.[9]
7-56-1
Kwiatkowski T.[14]
Giron M.[3]
4-67-636-4
Nakashima B.
Eubanks C.[10]
7-657-5
Bangoura S.
King D.[7]
1-66-46-0
Gomez E.[4]
Escobedo E.[15]
7-642-66-2
Escobar G.
Torpegaard M.[5]
6-47-69
Paul T.[1]
Gaston H.
7-686-1
R32
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Leshem E.
6-46-0
Escobedo E.[15]
Young D.
6-14-2
Escobar G.
Krueger M.[11]
7-676-3
Quiroz R.
Kudla D.[2]
6-36-2
Cressy M.[16]
Wolf J.
6-16-4
Giron M.[3]
Redlicki M.
6-47-5
Eubanks C.[10]
Arevalo M.
6-46-4
Nakashima B.
Mmoh M.[6]
5-76-36-4
King D.[7]
Blanch U.
2-67-627-5
Bangoura S.
Polansky P.[12]
6-16-4
Gomez E.[4]
Pervolarakis M.
5-76-06-4
Torpegaard M.[5]
Peniston R.
4-66-46-3
Gaston H.
Galan D.[13]
3-66-36-4
Paul T.[1]
Holt B.
5-76-36-2
Kwiatkowski T.[14]
Gomez Herrera C.
6-46-4
Couacaud E.[9]
Aragone J.
6-36-1
R64
Pervolarakis M.
Sinclair C.
6-37-60
Gomez Herrera C.
Fanselow S.
6-44-66-2
Aragone J.
Altamirano C.
6-27-63
Quiroz R.
Styler O.
3-66-46-4
Wolf J.
Sarkissian A.
6-737-636-4
Leshem E.
Crawford O.
6-736-46-4
Redlicki M.
Peliwo F.
6-35-76-3
Arevalo M.
Zhu E.
6-36-4
Blanch U.
Nava E.
6-26-3
Bangoura S.
Geerts M.
6-47-5
Young D.
Shane R.
6-16-1
Peniston R.
Ritschard A.
6-06-4
Escobar G.
Smith R.
6-23-66-2
Gaston H.
Song E.
3-66-46-4
Holt B.
Sarmiento R.
6-46-766-3
Nakashima B.
Redlicki M.
6-36-3