Tommy Paul vs Emilio Gomez — Acapulco Round of 32

Acapulco · ATP · Round of 32
Tommy Paul
USA7
Tommy Paul
#25ATP
1949ELO
1881Hard ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 February 2023
hard
ECU
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Paul T.
6-1 7-6
Gomez E.
Paul T.
6772
Gomez E.
1640

Tommy Paul defeated Emilio Gomez 6-1 7-6 in the Acapulco round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tommy Paul came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Tommy Paul came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Paul T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Serve advantage — Paul T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Paul T.Gomez E.
71
Serve
—
54
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Paul T.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.1
3.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 55). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paul T.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
93
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
77
Break points won·Dominant
87
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
23
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
96
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Paul T.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gomez E.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
5.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
5.7
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Paul T.Gomez E.
Freshness·
86
—

Paul T.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
30°CClear
Wind 15 km/hHumidity 57%
Final
De Minaur A.[8]
Paul T.[7]
3-66-46-1
Semi-finals
De Minaur A.[8]
Rune H.[4]
3-67-56-2
Paul T.[7]
Fritz T.[3]
6-36-727-62
Quarter-finals
Rune H.[4]
Berrettini M.
6-01-0
Fritz T.[3]
Tiafoe F.[6]
6-36-4
De Minaur A.[8]
Daniel T.
6-26-2
Paul T.[7]
Mcdonald M.
6-26-2
R16
Paul T.[7]
Mmoh M.
6-42-2
Tiafoe F.[6]
Lopez F.
6-27-66
Rune H.[4]
Borges N.
6-06-2
Daniel T.
Ruud C.[2]
7-52-67-65
De Minaur A.[8]
Berrettini J.
6-16-0
Mcdonald M.
Nakashima B.
6-26-0
Berrettini M.
Ymer E.
6-36-3
Fritz T.[3]
Shapovalov D.
6-46-4
R32
Nakashima B.
Altmaier D.
6-33-66-1
Shapovalov D.
Kecmanovic M.
6-746-07-5
Lopez F.
Eubanks C.
7-636-4
Tiafoe F.[6]
Nishioka Y.
7-666-4
Berrettini M.
Molcan A.
6-01-0
Borges N.
Chappell N.
6-37-63
De Minaur A.[8]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-16-2
Berrettini J.
Otte O.
3-67-632-1
Ruud C.[2]
Andreozzi G.
6-44-67-62
Ymer E.
Mannarino A.
5-76-36-4
Rune H.[4]
Shelton B.
6-776-46-2
Mcdonald M.
Darderi L.
6-46-2
Mmoh M.
Giron M.
7-636-1
Paul T.[7]
Gomez E.
6-17-64
Daniel T.
Wolf J.
6-46-4
Fritz T.[3]
Isner J.
3-66-36-4