Jordan Thompson vs Max Purcell — Anning CH Round of 32

Anning CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jordan Thompson
AUS1
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1605Clay ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2019
clay
AUS
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
Thompson J.
6-3 6-4
Purcell M.
Thompson J.
662
Purcell M.
340

Jordan Thompson defeated Max Purcell 6-3 6-4 in the Anning CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Max Purcell came in leading the head-to-head 2–1. Jordan Thompson narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-09-20ChengduR32hardJordan Thompson6-2 7-6(8)
2023-05-29Roland GarrosR128clayMax Purcell7-5 1-6 6-4 6-4
2021-08-23Winston-SalemR32hardMax Purcell7-5 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Purcell M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Purcell M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
62%
Aces / match·Even
7.2
7.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.3
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Purcell M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
70
59
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
92
Break points won·Clear edge
24
10
Deciding sets·Slight edge
91
84
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
95
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Clarke J.[14]
Gunneswaran P.[2]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Majchrzak K.[3]
7-656-736-4
Clarke J.[14]
Oliveira G.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.[3]
Ramanathan R.[5]
6-17-64
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Milojevic N.[10]
7-56-3
Oliveira G.
Bolt A.[6]
6-756-46-3
Clarke J.[14]
Duckworth J.[9]
7-53-66-1
R16
Bolt A.[6]
Lopez Perez E.[11]
6-36-4
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Pavlasek A.[15]
7-56-3
Milojevic N.[10]
Martin A.
6-16-706-1
Oliveira G.
Jung J.[4]
6-37-61
Clarke J.[14]
Thompson J.[1]
7-52-66-2
Majchrzak K.[3]
Janvier M.[13]
6-36-4
Ramanathan R.[5]
Zhang Z.
6-33-66-3
Duckworth J.[9]
Kubler J.[8]
7-57-65
R32
Pavlasek A.[15]
Chung Y.
7-623-1
Majchrzak K.[3]
Banes M.
6-46-1
Kubler J.[8]
Ochi M.
6-26-1
Clarke J.[14]
Viola M.
6-46-3
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Myneni S.
6-26-4
Milojevic N.[10]
Li Z.
6-46-3
Janvier M.[13]
Yang T.
6-757-57-62
Zhang Z.
Nedovyesov A.[12]
7-612-66-2
Ramanathan R.[5]
Bai Y.
6-46-4
Bolt A.[6]
Uchiyama Y.
2-67-626-4
Lopez Perez E.[11]
Saville L.
6-36-4
Oliveira G.
Zhang Z.[16]
7-686-3
Jung J.[4]
Ignatik U.
6-35-77-5
Duckworth J.[9]
Grills J.
6-36-4
Thompson J.[1]
Purcell M.
6-36-4
Martin A.
Novak D.[7]
6-16-1
R64
Purcell M.
Wu D.
6-44-66-2
Oliveira G.
Xia Z.
6-26-0
Banes M.
Patael B.
4-66-37-65
Chung Y.
Liu H.
6-16-3
Myneni S.
Safranek V.
6-26-4
Yang T.
Uchida K.
6-736-36-1
Uchiyama Y.
Lamasine T.
6-45-77-5
Saville L.
Harris A.
3-66-46-4
Ignatik U.
Barrientos N.
6-26-2
Ochi M.
Li Y.
6-27-66
Grills J.
He Y.
6-16-4
Viola M.
Gao X.
6-36-1
Li Z.
Wu T.
6-27-65
Martin A.
Sun F.
6-36-1
Zhang Z.
Santillan A.
5-77-656-0
Bai Y.
Mukund S.
6-16-4