Max Purcell vs Jordan Thompson — Winston-Salem Round of 32

Winston-Salem · ATP · Round of 32
AUS
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 August 2021
hard
Jordan Thompson
AUS
Jordan Thompson
#156ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
Purcell M.
7-5 6-4
Thompson J.
Purcell M.
762
Thompson J.
540

Max Purcell defeated Jordan Thompson 7-5 6-4 in the Winston-Salem round of 32 on hard. Max Purcell extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-09-20ChengduR32hardJordan Thompson6-2 7-6(8)
2023-05-29Roland GarrosR128clayMax Purcell7-5 1-6 6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Thompson J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Thompson J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Even
7.6
7.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Purcell M.Thompson J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
59
70
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
97
Break points won·Clear edge
10
24
Deciding sets·Slight edge
84
91
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
81
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Purcell M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Thompson J.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
5.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Ivashka I.
Ymer M.
6-06-2
Semi-finals
Ymer M.
Alcaraz C.[15]
7-56-3
Ivashka I.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Alcaraz C.[15]
Giron M.
7-626-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Gasquet R.[14]
7-656-1
Ivashka I.
Carreno Busta P.[1]
7-626-3
Ymer M.
Tiafoe F.[13]
6-726-26-3
R16
Tiafoe F.[13]
Monteiro T.
7-57-62
Ymer M.
Purcell M.
7-56-2
Alcaraz C.[15]
Fucsovics M.[4]
6-30-66-2
Giron M.
Herbert P.
4-66-36-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Paire B.[12]
6-44-66-1
Gasquet R.[14]
Evans D.[3]
6-47-64
Carreno Busta P.[1]
Koepfer D.[16]
6-26-3
Ivashka I.
Struff J.[9]
6-26-1
R32
Gasquet R.[14]
Gerasimov E.
7-647-66
Tiafoe F.[13]
Murray A.
7-646-3
Ymer M.
Ramos A.[11]
6-36-1
Purcell M.
Thompson J.
7-56-4
Fucsovics M.[4]
Watanuki Y.
7-56-1
Alcaraz C.[15]
Popyrin A.
6-796-17-61
Giron M.
Delbonis F.[10]
6-36-4
Herbert P.
Coria F.
6-46-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Bublik A.[5]
6-27-65
Paire B.[12]
Simon G.
6-36-3
Evans D.[3]
Pouille L.
3-66-46-1
Ivashka I.
Cilic M.[6]
4-67-56-4
Struff J.[9]
Mager G.
6-26-2
Koepfer D.[16]
Cecchinato M.
5-76-46-4
Carreno Busta P.[1]
Kwon S.
6-33-66-4
Monteiro T.
Nava E.
7-56-1
R64
Murray A.
Rubin N.
6-26-0
Gerasimov E.
Gombos N.
7-663-66-2
Monteiro T.
Duckworth J.
6-44-67-65
Ymer M.
Travaglia S.
6-21-66-2
Thompson J.
Pella G.
6-11-66-3
Watanuki Y.
Munar J.
3-66-36-0
Popyrin A.
Johnson S.
7-56-4
Ivashka I.
Seppi A.
6-46-4
Mager G.
Wu T.
7-656-3
Cecchinato M.
Sandgren T.
6-46-4
Kwon S.
Albot R.
6-27-5
Giron M.
Bagnis F.
7-56-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Kudla D.
6-36-4
Simon G.
Rinderknech A.
7-56-3
Pouille L.
Lopez F.
6-16-4
Coria F.
Musetti L.
6-44-66-4