Thomas Fabbiano vs Sumit Nagal — Ningbo CH Round of 32

Ningbo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA3
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 October 2018
hard
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1476Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
Fabbiano T.
4-6 6-4 6-2
Nagal S.
Fabbiano T.
4662
Nagal S.
6421

Thomas Fabbiano defeated Sumit Nagal 4-6 6-4 6-2 in the Ningbo CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Sumit Nagal came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Thomas Fabbiano claimed a first win over Sumit Nagal in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-04-19BarcelonaQ2claySumit Nagal7-6(1) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Fabbiano T.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Serve advantage — Nagal S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fabbiano T.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fabbiano T.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
28
33
Break points saved·Clear edge
81
69
Break points won·Clear edge
16
35
Deciding sets·Clear edge
28
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Fabbiano T.Nagal S.
Freshness·
—
96

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Fabbiano T.[3]
Gunneswaran P.[7]
7-644-66-3
Semi-finals
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Kecmanovic M.[5]
6-26-2
Fabbiano T.[3]
Albot R.[2]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Chung Y.
6-26-1
Fabbiano T.[3]
Gaio F.
1-66-46-4
Albot R.[2]
Ito T.[8]
7-56-4
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Durasovic V.
6-26-4
R16
Ito T.[8]
Te R.
6-46-4
Fabbiano T.[3]
Moriya H.
6-46-4
Gaio F.
Soeda G.
6-47-67
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Li Z.
6-32-67-60
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Davidovich Fokina A.
4-66-36-4
Durasovic V.
Hurkacz H.[1]
7-646-4
Albot R.[2]
Tokuda R.
6-47-63
Chung Y.
Watanuki Y.
2-67-656-3
R32
Fabbiano T.[3]
Nagal S.
4-66-46-2
Li Z.
Oliveira G.
4-67-656-3
Te R.
Zhang Z.
6-16-2
Moriya H.
Wu D.
6-46-4
Gaio F.
Coppejans K.
6-32-66-4
Watanuki Y.
Broady L.
6-27-5
Kecmanovic M.[5]
He Y.
6-16-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Yang T.
6-37-5
Ito T.[8]
Takahashi Y.
7-636-3
Chung Y.
Ramanathan R.[4]
1-67-677-62
Albot R.[2]
Sun F.
6-46-3
Durasovic V.
Wu Y.
6-47-5
Tokuda R.
Myneni S.
6-36-2
Hurkacz H.[1]
Xia Z.
6-37-63
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Safwat M.
7-676-2
Soeda G.
Lopez Perez E.[6]
7-693-67-67