Sumit Nagal vs Thomas Fabbiano — Barcelona Qualifying Round 2

Barcelona · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 April 2021
clay
ITA
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
Nagal S.
7-6 6-3
Fabbiano T.
Nagal S.
7762
Fabbiano T.
613–

Sumit Nagal defeated Thomas Fabbiano 7-6 6-3 in the Barcelona qualifying round 2 on clay. The result followed the form book — Sumit Nagal came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Sumit Nagal extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-04-19BarcelonaQ2claySumit Nagal7-6(1) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Fabbiano T.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Fabbiano T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
57%
Aces / match·Even
1.5
2.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 92). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Fabbiano T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
33
28
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
81
Break points won·Clear edge
35
16
Deciding sets·Clear edge
16
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Fabbiano T.
Freshness·
96
—

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw — qualifying

Q2
Ivashka I.
Gaio F.
6-36-2
Zapata Miralles B.
Cachin P.
7-56-3
Rune H.
Gojowczyk P.
3-66-37-5
Nagal S.
Fabbiano T.
7-616-3
Griekspoor T.
Gimeno Valero C.
6-747-646-3
Kuznetsov A.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-36-2
Q1
Gaio F.
Robredo T.
7-636-4
Kuznetsov A.
Hoang A.
6-05-77-66
Ivashka I.
Cressy M.
6-16-3
Griekspoor T.
Rodionov J.
6-47-5
Van De Zandschulp B.
Novak D.
6-17-62
Gimeno Valero C.
Kukushkin M.
6-16-2
Nagal S.
Marchenko I.
3-66-27-5
Fabbiano T.
Huesler M.
6-36-1
Gojowczyk P.
Safwat M.
6-46-0
Rune H.
Ymer M.
6-06-2
Cachin P.
Laaksonen H.
6-35-76-4
Zapata Miralles B.
Sandgren T.
2-66-26-3