Roberto Bautista Agut vs Andrey Rublev — Shanghai Masters Round of 64

Shanghai Masters · ATP · Round of 64
Roberto Bautista Agut
ESP
Roberto Bautista Agut
#180ATP
1700ELO
1668Hard ELO
$430kYTD
$20MCAREER
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 October 2018
hard
Andrey Rublev
RUS
Andrey Rublev
#16ATP
1902ELO
1849Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
Bautista Agut R.
6-3 6-4
Rublev A.
Bautista Agut R.
662
Rublev A.
340

Roberto Bautista Agut defeated Andrey Rublev 6-3 6-4 in the Shanghai Masters round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Andrey Rublev came in ranked #16, leading the head-to-head 5–3, defending last year's round of 32. Roberto Bautista Agut narrowed the head-to-head to 5–4.

Key context

Head to head

3–5
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-06-19HalleSFgrassAndrey Rublev6-3 6-4
2023-01-02Adelaide 1R32hardRoberto Bautista Agut4-6 6-3 6-4
2021-05-10Rome MastersR16clayAndrey Rublev6-4 6-4
2021-04-12Monte Carlo MastersR16clayAndrey Rublev7-6(2) 5-7 6-3
2021-03-08DohaSFhardRoberto Bautista Agut6-3 6-3
2020-09-21HamburgQFclayAndrey Rublev6-2 7-5
2019-11-19Davis Cup Finals RR: ESP vs RUSRRhardAndrey Rublev3-6 6-3 7-6(0)
2015-10-26ValenciaR16hardRoberto Bautista Agut6-2 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Bautista Agut R.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Rublev A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Bautista Agut R.

Serve advantage — Rublev A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Bautista Agut R.Rublev A.
23
Serve
55
28
Return
49

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bautista Agut R.Rublev A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
67%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.9
7.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bautista Agut R.Rublev A.
Clutch Rating·Even
85
88
Break points saved·Even
98
100
Break points won·Even
75
72
Deciding sets·Slight edge
87
97
Tiebreaks·Even
93
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Bautista Agut R.Rublev A.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Bautista Agut R.: 15 days rest · Rublev A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
25°COvercast
Wind 12 km/hHumidity 50%
Final
Djokovic N.[2]
Coric B.[13]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Djokovic N.[2]
Zverev A.[4]
6-26-1
Coric B.[13]
Federer R.[1]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Djokovic N.[2]
Anderson K.[7]
7-616-3
Coric B.[13]
Ebden M.
7-56-4
Federer R.[1]
Nishikori K.[8]
6-47-64
Zverev A.[4]
Edmund K.[11]
6-46-4
R16
Coric B.[13]
del Potro J.[3]
7-50-0
Djokovic N.[2]
Cecchinato M.[16]
6-46-0
Anderson K.[7]
Tsitsipas S.[10]
6-47-61
Zverev A.[4]
De Minaur A.
6-16-4
Ebden M.
Gojowczyk P.
6-26-3
Nishikori K.[8]
Querrey S.
7-676-4
Federer R.[1]
Bautista Agut R.
6-32-66-4
Edmund K.[11]
Jarry N.
7-656-3
R32
Cecchinato M.[16]
Chung H.
4-67-657-65
Tsitsipas S.[10]
Khachanov K.
6-47-68
Anderson K.[7]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-2
Zverev A.[4]
Basilashvili N.
7-56-4
Edmund K.[11]
Seppi A.
6-36-4
Jarry N.
Cilic M.[5]
2-67-667-5
Ebden M.
Thiem D.[6]
6-46-787-64
Bautista Agut R.
Mcdonald M.
3-66-46-1
Federer R.[1]
Medvedev D.
6-44-66-4
Gojowczyk P.
Fucsovics M.
6-46-737-65
Coric B.[13]
Klahn B.
6-46-2
del Potro J.[3]
Gasquet R.
7-57-67
Querrey S.
Fritz T.
6-36-747-5
Nishikori K.[8]
Wu Y.
3-66-06-3
De Minaur A.
Paire B.
6-46-3
Djokovic N.[2]
Chardy J.
6-37-5
R64
Ebden M.
Tiafoe F.
3-66-46-3
Chardy J.
Marterer M.
6-37-65
Cecchinato M.[16]
Simon G.
6-746-47-62
Tsitsipas S.[10]
Monfils G.
7-644-66-4
Kukushkin M.
Ramos A.
6-46-2
Basilashvili N.
Shapovalov D.
6-26-2
Paire B.
Carreno Busta P.[15]
6-36-4
Seppi A.
Mannarino A.
6-46-4
Jarry N.
Zverev M.
6-43-67-65
Coric B.[13]
Wawrinka S.
4-66-46-3
Klahn B.
Kyrgios N.
4-66-46-3
Gasquet R.
Mayer L.
1-66-26-1
Wu Y.
Li Z.
7-656-2
Fritz T.
Haase R.
6-37-63
Querrey S.
Schwartzman D.[9]
6-36-4
Medvedev D.
Zhang Z.
3-67-676-4
De Minaur A.
Pospisil V.
6-47-64
Gojowczyk P.
Sock J.[12]
6-46-766-3
Khachanov K.
Johnson S.
6-766-36-4
Edmund K.[11]
Krajinovic F.
7-56-3
Chung H.
Hurkacz H.
6-42-66-1
Mcdonald M.
Raonic M.[14]
6-35-76-3
Bautista Agut R.
Rublev A.
6-36-4
Fucsovics M.
Dzumhur D.
6-36-4