Taro Daniel vs Nicolas Jarry — Winston-Salem Quarter-final

Winston-Salem · ATP · Quarter-final
Taro Daniel
JPN
Taro Daniel
#203ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 August 2018
hard
Nicolas Jarry
CHI14
Nicolas Jarry
#211ATP
1648ELO
1574Hard ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
Daniel T.
4-6 6-2 6-1
Jarry N.
Daniel T.
4662
Jarry N.
6211

Taro Daniel defeated Nicolas Jarry 4-6 6-2 6-1 in the Winston-Salem quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Nicolas Jarry came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Taro Daniel claimed a first win over Nicolas Jarry in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-05-20GenevaQFclayNicolas Jarry6-1 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Daniel T.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Jarry N.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Daniel T.Jarry N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
68%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Even
62%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.0
9.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Daniel T.Jarry N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
42
48
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
98
Break points won·Dominant
37
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
57
Tiebreaks·Even
81
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Daniel T.Jarry N.
Freshness·
72
—

Daniel T.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Medvedev D.
Johnson S.[8]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Johnson S.[8]
Carreno Busta P.[2]
6-36-4
Medvedev D.
Daniel T.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Daniel T.
Jarry N.[14]
4-66-26-1
Medvedev D.
Harrison R.
7-646-4
Carreno Busta P.[2]
Chung H.[6]
6-36-4
Johnson S.[8]
Edmund K.[3]
6-16-2
R16
Daniel T.
Koepfer D.
7-647-63
Carreno Busta P.[2]
Gojowczyk P.[16]
6-27-65
Edmund K.[3]
Carballes Baena R.
7-57-5
Chung H.[6]
Berrettini M.
6-33-66-3
Medvedev D.
Andreozzi G.
7-56-1
Jarry N.[14]
Struff J.
6-26-2
Johnson S.[8]
Munar J.
6-46-4
Harrison R.
Krajinovic F.[7]
6-37-64
R32
Berrettini M.
Basilashvili N.[10]
7-56-3
Harrison R.
Simon G.[12]
W/O
Krajinovic F.[7]
Fritz T.
6-46-1
Carreno Busta P.[2]
Skugor F.
6-36-736-3
Johnson S.[8]
Paul T.
7-676-2
Andreozzi G.
Albot R.
6-46-3
Medvedev D.
De Minaur A.[15]
6-36-3
Struff J.
Cecchinato M.[4]
6-36-4
Carballes Baena R.
Ramos A.[13]
6-16-3
Daniel T.
Querrey S.[9]
3-67-57-63
Gojowczyk P.[16]
Zeballos H.
6-46-746-1
Edmund K.[3]
Mayer L.
6-36-3
Chung H.[6]
Garcia Lopez G.
7-646-2
Jarry N.[14]
Seppi A.
6-46-3
Koepfer D.
Sandgren T.
6-27-65
Munar J.
Rublev A.[11]
6-36-2
R64
Munar J.
Schnur B.
7-657-61
Sandgren T.
Berankis R.
6-46-3
Daniel T.
Millman J.
6-47-67
Garcia Lopez G.
Baghdatis M.
7-626-4
Struff J.
Paire B.
7-656-3
Carballes Baena R.
Pella G.
6-46-2
Berrettini M.
Benneteau J.
6-36-3
Harrison R.
Gojo B.
6-26-4
Skugor F.
Herbert P.
6-26-3
Medvedev D.
Basic M.
6-46-4
Mayer L.
Sugita Y.
6-37-64
Andreozzi G.
Fucsovics M.
6-34-66-0
Paul T.
Djere L.
6-37-64
Zeballos H.
Lacko L.
7-637-5
Seppi A.
Sousa J.
7-56-4
Fritz T.
Jaziri M.
6-16-4