Nicolas Jarry vs Albert Ramos — Sao Paulo Quarter-final

Sao Paulo · ATP · Quarter-final
Nicolas Jarry
CHI
Nicolas Jarry
#764ATP
1648ELO
1642Clay ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 February 2018
clay
ESP1
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Jarry N.
6-7 6-4 7-6
Ramos A.
Jarry N.
666772
Ramos A.
784631

Nicolas Jarry defeated Albert Ramos 6-7 6-4 7-6 in the Sao Paulo quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Albert Ramos came in leading the head-to-head 2–1, defending last year's final, but Nicolas Jarry had been the form player, winning 4 of their last 6 on clay. Nicolas Jarry narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-07-18GstaadQFclayAlbert Ramos7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(8)
2018-10-29Paris MastersQ1hardAlbert Ramos7-6(2) 6-4
2018-02-19Rio de JaneiroR16clayNicolas Jarry7-5 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Jarry N.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Ramos A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Serve advantage — Jarry N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jarry N.Ramos A.
1st serve in·Even
65%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
60%
Return points won·Even
34%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.9
2.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jarry N.Ramos A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
48
59
Break points saved·Even
98
95
Break points won·Dominant
4
49
Deciding sets·Clear edge
57
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Fognini F.[2]
Jarry N.
1-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Jarry N.
Zeballos H.
6-756-46-4
Fognini F.[2]
Cuevas P.[3]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Cuevas P.[3]
Mayer L.[5]
6-26-7137-65
Fognini F.[2]
Garcia Lopez G.
6-46-2
Jarry N.
Ramos A.[1]
6-766-47-63
Zeballos H.
Dutra Silva R.
6-736-26-4
R16
Cuevas P.[3]
Ofner S.
6-47-64
Garcia Lopez G.
Delbonis F.[8]
7-634-66-4
Jarry N.
Pella G.[6]
6-726-47-62
Mayer L.[5]
Berlocq C.
7-56-4
Dutra Silva R.
Kicker N.
6-46-2
Fognini F.[2]
Domingues J.
7-56-1
Zeballos H.
Monfils G.[4]
6-33-66-3
Ramos A.[1]
Clezar G.
6-36-4
R32
Pella G.[6]
Moutet C.
4-66-16-2
Garcia Lopez G.
Melzer G.
6-43-66-3
Delbonis F.[8]
Carballes Baena R.
6-46-4
Domingues J.
Olivo R.
2-67-667-5
Clezar G.
Monteiro T.
6-31-67-5
Dutra Silva R.
Sandgren T.[7]
6-06-4
Ofner S.
Cecchinato M.
6-36-3
Mayer L.[5]
Elias G.
5-77-6107-65
Berlocq C.
Seyboth Wild T.
3-66-36-2
Kicker N.
Estrella V.
7-656-3
Zeballos H.
Bellucci T.
7-623-66-3
Jarry N.
Lajovic D.
6-41-67-5