Jason Jung vs Alexander Bublik — Dallas CH Round of 32

Dallas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jason Jung
TPE
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 January 2018
hard
Alexander Bublik
KAZ5
Alexander Bublik
#11ATP
1889ELO
1837Hard ELO
$1.2MYTD
$12MCAREER
29 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLL
Jung J.
6-4 6-4
Bublik A.
Jung J.
662
Bublik A.
440

Jason Jung defeated Alexander Bublik 6-4 6-4 in the Dallas CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alexander Bublik came in ranked #11, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jason Jung claimed a first win over Alexander Bublik in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Jung edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-07-12NewportQFgrassAlexander Bublik6-2 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Jung J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Bublik A.

Bublik A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Jung J.Bublik A.
—
Serve
65
—
Return
25

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Jung J.Bublik A.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
77%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
46%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.8
11.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.7
5.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jung J.Bublik A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
21
88
Break points saved·Dominant
64
99
Break points won·Dominant
8
67
Deciding sets·Dominant
21
99
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Jung J.Bublik A.
Freshness·Even
78
78

Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d) · Bublik A.: 8 days rest · 4 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nishikori K.[1]
Mcdonald M.
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Nishikori K.[1]
Jung J.
6-46-4
Mcdonald M.
Kudla D.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Jung J.
Kecmanovic M.
6-16-1
Mcdonald M.
Smyczek T.[7]
6-46-2
Kudla D.
Fritz T.[3]
6-36-3
Nishikori K.[1]
Koepfer D.
7-636-3
R16
Mcdonald M.
Tiafoe F.[2]
7-52-66-3
Smyczek T.[7]
Collarini A.
6-46-4
Jung J.
Hiltzik J.
4-66-16-4
Kudla D.
Paul T.[8]
7-666-4
Kecmanovic M.
Krajicek A.
7-646-757-64
Fritz T.[3]
Klahn B.
6-42-67-62
Koepfer D.
Oliveira G.
6-07-5
Nishikori K.[1]
Bachinger M.
4-66-46-4
R32
Oliveira G.
Hanfmann Y.[6]
7-637-65
Jung J.
Bublik A.[5]
6-46-4
Tiafoe F.[2]
Kozlov S.
6-27-65
Collarini A.
Pavic A.
1-67-667-69
Smyczek T.[7]
Krueger M.
6-14-66-3
Fritz T.[3]
Cervantes Huegun I.
6-25-76-1
Kudla D.
Kypson P.
6-36-1
Krajicek A.
Peliwo F.
6-36-3
Kecmanovic M.
Fratangelo B.[4]
6-43-66-4
Nishikori K.[1]
Novikov D.
6-36-3
Paul T.[8]
Satral J.
6-36-3
Klahn B.
Giron M.
6-42-66-4
Koepfer D.
Ferrari F.
6-766-26-2
Bachinger M.
Karlovskiy E.
2-66-36-4
Mcdonald M.
Ito T.
7-56-3
Hiltzik J.
Schnur B.
5-76-27-67