Alexander Bublik vs Jason Jung — Newport Quarter-final

Newport · ATP · Quarter-final
Alexander Bublik
KAZ1
Alexander Bublik
#11ATP
1889ELO
1802Grass ELO
$1.2MYTD
$12MCAREER
29 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
grass
Jason Jung
TPE
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1417Grass ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
Bublik A.
6-2 6-4
Jung J.
Bublik A.
662
Jung J.
240

Alexander Bublik defeated Jason Jung 6-2 6-4 in the Newport quarter-final on grass. The result followed the form book — Alexander Bublik came in ranked #11.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bublik A.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Jung J.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Bublik A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bublik A.Jung J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.0
2.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bublik A.Jung J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
21
Break points saved·Dominant
99
64
Break points won·Dominant
67
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bublik A.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Jung J.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
4.2
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
6.8
0.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bublik A.Jung J.
Freshness·Even
78
78

Bublik A.: 8 days rest · 4 matches (14d) · Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Anderson K.[8]
Brooksby J.
7-686-4
Semi-finals
Brooksby J.
Thompson J.[7]
6-37-63
Anderson K.[8]
Bublik A.[1]
4-67-637-5
Quarter-finals
Bublik A.[1]
Jung J.
6-26-4
Thompson J.[7]
Cressy M.
6-37-66
Brooksby J.
Gojowczyk P.
6-06-3
Anderson K.[8]
Sock J.
6-756-26-4
R16
Gojowczyk P.
Pospisil V.[4]
6-36-3
Brooksby J.
Kudla D.
6-34-67-5
Cressy M.
Querrey S.[2]
6-42-66-2
Thompson J.[7]
Sugita Y.
6-06-2
Anderson K.[8]
Ofner S.
7-57-63
Sock J.
Nishioka Y.[3]
6-26-3
Jung J.
Sandgren T.[5]
6-26-2
Bublik A.[1]
Karlovic I.
7-654-66-1
R32
Thompson J.[7]
Stebe C.
5-4
Jung J.
Schnur B.
7-56-717-64
Brooksby J.
Donskoy E.
7-56-3
Kudla D.
Johnson S.[6]
7-633-66-4
Sugita Y.
Rodionov J.
7-56-3
Gojowczyk P.
Krueger M.
6-26-2
Anderson K.[8]
Marchenko I.
7-56-3
Ofner S.
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-4
Sock J.
Bolt A.
3-66-46-3
Sandgren T.[5]
Sousa J.
6-47-63
Karlovic I.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-756-16-4
Cressy M.
Lorenzi P.
6-16-2