Quentin Halys vs Casper Ruud — Aptos CH Round of 32

Aptos CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Quentin Halys
FRA
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 August 2017
hard
Casper Ruud
NOR7
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1889Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
Halys Q.
6-4 3-6 6-3
Ruud C.
Halys Q.
6362
Ruud C.
4631

Quentin Halys defeated Casper Ruud 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Aptos CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Casper Ruud came in ranked #13, leading the head-to-head 3–0. Quentin Halys claimed a first win over Casper Ruud in four meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Quentin Halys closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

0–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-10-20BaselR32hardCasper Ruud6-1 7-6(3)
2023-04-03EstorilSFclayCasper Ruud6-4 3-6 7-6(2)
2018-01-15Australian OpenR128hardCasper Ruud6-3 3-6 6-7(5) 7-5 11-9
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Halys Q.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Ruud C.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Halys Q.Ruud C.
39
Serve
59
26
Return
31

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Halys Q.Ruud C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Even
67%
66%
Return points won·Even
34%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
5.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Halys Q.Ruud C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
91
Break points saved·Even
97
99
Break points won·Dominant
4
75
Deciding sets·Clear edge
75
99
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
91
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Halys Q.Ruud C.
Freshness·Slight edge
93
100

Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Ruud C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Bublik A.
Broady L.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Bublik A.
Groth S.
7-626-3
Broady L.
Fritz T.
7-636-3
Quarter-finals
Fritz T.
Sandgren T.[6]
7-57-61
Groth S.
Santillan A.
7-57-66
Bublik A.
Novikov D.
6-16-4
Broady L.
Sarmiento R.
6-46-4
R16
Santillan A.
King D.
6-36-4
Groth S.
Jung J.
4-66-36-0
Bublik A.
Laaksonen H.[3]
6-16-1
Novikov D.
Kukushkin M.[5]
6-737-636-3
Sarmiento R.
Halys Q.
6-44-66-3
Broady L.
De Loore J.
6-26-2
Sandgren T.[6]
Mcdonald M.
6-16-2
Fritz T.
Krajicek A.
2-66-16-2
R32
Santillan A.
Thompson J.[2]
6-45-76-2
King D.
Rungkat C.
6-26-3
Jung J.
Norrie C.
7-56-4
Groth S.
Fratangelo B.[8]
6-756-46-3
Laaksonen H.[3]
Ramanathan R.
6-36-2
Novikov D.
Sakharov G.
6-46-4
Kukushkin M.[5]
Gabashvili T.
6-46-4
Halys Q.
Ruud C.[7]
6-43-66-3
Sarmiento R.
Rubin N.
7-656-2
De Loore J.
Lamble J.
6-36-1
Broady L.
Bemelmans R.[4]
3-66-46-2
Sandgren T.[6]
Nielsen F.
6-26-4
Mcdonald M.
Millman J.
6-736-46-0
Fritz T.
Kravchuk K.
6-36-4
Krajicek A.
Jaziri M.[1]
6-26-1
Bublik A.
Krueger M.
6-32-66-4