Casper Ruud vs Quentin Halys — Estoril Semi-final

Estoril · ATP · Semi-final
Casper Ruud
NOR1
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1973Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 April 2023
clay
Quentin Halys
FRA
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1664Clay ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
Ruud C.
6-4 3-6 7-6
Halys Q.
Ruud C.
63772
Halys Q.
46621

Casper Ruud defeated Quentin Halys 6-4 3-6 7-6 in the Estoril semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Casper Ruud came in ranked #13, leading the head-to-head 2–0. Casper Ruud extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Casper Ruud closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-10-20BaselR32hardCasper Ruud6-1 7-6(3)
2018-01-15Australian OpenR128hardCasper Ruud6-3 3-6 6-7(5) 7-5 11-9
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Ruud C.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Halys Q.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ruud C.Halys Q.
54
Serve
—
69
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruud C.Halys Q.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
67%
Return points won·Even
38%
34%
Break points saved·Even
66%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.7
11.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruud C.Halys Q.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
57
Break points saved·Even
99
97
Break points won·Dominant
75
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
99
75
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
97
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruud C.
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Halys Q.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.9+309 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.1Clay Elo 1664
8.1Overall Elo 1983
ELO gap
1.9Overall Elo 1707
5.0
H2H
5.0
9.0
Surface form
6.7
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
5.3
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ruud C.Halys Q.
Freshness·Slight edge
98
92

Ruud C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Halys Q.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Ruud C.[1]
Kecmanovic M.[6]
6-27-63
Semi-finals
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Cecchinato M.
6-36-1
Ruud C.[1]
Halys Q.
6-43-67-62
Quarter-finals
Ruud C.[1]
Baez S.[5]
6-36-0
Cecchinato M.
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
7-57-65
Halys Q.
Thiem D.
6-16-4
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Zapata Miralles B.
7-56-2
R16
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Rodionov J.
6-06-1
Baez S.[5]
Cachin P.
6-47-62
Zapata Miralles B.
Hurkacz H.[2]
6-776-46-2
Cecchinato M.
Fognini F.
4-66-36-3
Ruud C.[1]
Sousa J.
4-66-26-2
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
Van Assche L.
6-37-5
Thiem D.
Shelton B.[8]
6-26-2
Halys Q.
Bautista Agut R.[4]
7-657-5
R32
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Nardi L.
6-46-1
Cecchinato M.
Schwartzman D.[7]
6-37-68
Cachin P.
Tseng C.
6-46-4
Zapata Miralles B.
Rocha H.
6-46-2
Halys Q.
Borges N.
6-36-4
Baez S.[5]
Albot R.
7-57-63
Van Assche L.
Sousa P.
6-756-36-1
Shelton B.[8]
Lestienne C.
7-57-5
Fognini F.
Giannessi A.
6-26-1
Thiem D.
Ofner S.
3-66-36-4
Rodionov J.
Ramos A.
3-66-16-4
Sousa J.
Zeppieri G.
6-41-66-3