Oscar Otte vs Quentin Halys — Qingdao CH Semi-final

Qingdao CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
GER
Oscar Otte
#1056ATP
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 April 2017
clay
Quentin Halys
FRA5
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1664Clay ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
Otte O.
7-5 6-4
Halys Q.
Otte O.
762
Halys Q.
540

Oscar Otte defeated Quentin Halys 7-5 6-4 in the Qingdao CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #90.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Otte O.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Halys Q.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Otte O.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Otte O.Halys Q.
1st serve in·Even
57%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Even
63%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.7
11.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.9
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Otte O.Halys Q.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
41
57
Break points saved·Even
93
97
Break points won·Dominant
30
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
75
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
80
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Otte O.Halys Q.
Freshness·
—
93

Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Otte O.
6-37-69
Semi-finals
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Bourgue M.[6]
6-36-4
Otte O.
Halys Q.[5]
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Martin A.[7]
6-46-1
Bourgue M.[6]
Coppejans K.
6-16-4
Otte O.
Wu D.
6-06-1
Halys Q.[5]
Thompson J.[1]
6-46-1
R16
Bourgue M.[6]
Auger Aliassime F.
6-36-2
Otte O.
De Minaur A.
6-16-1
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Ivashka I.
6-36-3
Martin A.[7]
Fabbiano T.
6-716-46-1
Coppejans K.
Quinzi G.
3-66-36-3
Wu D.
Doumbia S.
1-66-46-1
Halys Q.[5]
Bai Y.
6-16-4
Thompson J.[1]
Milojevic N.
6-33-66-1
R32
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Munoz de la Nava D.
6-37-61
Ivashka I.
Zhang Z.
4-66-16-2
Fabbiano T.
Maamoun K.
6-36-1
Martin A.[7]
Nedovyesov A.
6-47-65
Coppejans K.
Molchanov D.
6-16-0
Auger Aliassime F.
Majchrzak K.
5-76-46-3
Bourgue M.[6]
Sun F.
6-06-2
Wu D.
Gabashvili T.[8]
6-36-2
Doumbia S.
He Y.
6-16-3
Otte O.
Wang A.
6-16-0
De Minaur A.
Vanni L.[3]
6-746-16-4
Halys Q.[5]
Whittington A.
6-06-0
Bai Y.
Balazs A.
6-36-4
Milojevic N.
Tepavac M.
6-36-2
Quinzi G.
Kavcic B.[4]
6-46-4
Thompson J.[1]
Torebko P.
6-16-4