Janko Tipsarevic vs Daniel Munoz de la Nava — Qingdao CH Round of 32

Qingdao CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SRB2
Janko Tipsarevic
42 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 April 2017
clay
ESP
Daniel Munoz de la Nava
44 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Tipsarevic J.
6-3 7-6
Munoz de la Nava D.
Tipsarevic J.
6772
Munoz de la Nava D.
3610

Janko Tipsarevic defeated Daniel Munoz de la Nava 6-3 7-6 in the Qingdao CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Janko Tipsarevic came in defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tipsarevic J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Munoz de la Nava D.

Munoz de la Nava D.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Tipsarevic J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tipsarevic J.Munoz de la Nava D.
1st serve in·Even
56%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.3
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (63 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tipsarevic J.Munoz de la Nava D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
13
Break points saved·Dominant
93
61
Break points won·Clear edge
38
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
65
14
Tiebreaks·Dominant
60
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Otte O.
6-37-69
Semi-finals
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Bourgue M.[6]
6-36-4
Otte O.
Halys Q.[5]
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Martin A.[7]
6-46-1
Bourgue M.[6]
Coppejans K.
6-16-4
Otte O.
Wu D.
6-06-1
Halys Q.[5]
Thompson J.[1]
6-46-1
R16
Bourgue M.[6]
Auger Aliassime F.
6-36-2
Otte O.
De Minaur A.
6-16-1
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Ivashka I.
6-36-3
Martin A.[7]
Fabbiano T.
6-716-46-1
Coppejans K.
Quinzi G.
3-66-36-3
Wu D.
Doumbia S.
1-66-46-1
Halys Q.[5]
Bai Y.
6-16-4
Thompson J.[1]
Milojevic N.
6-33-66-1
R32
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Munoz de la Nava D.
6-37-61
Ivashka I.
Zhang Z.
4-66-16-2
Fabbiano T.
Maamoun K.
6-36-1
Martin A.[7]
Nedovyesov A.
6-47-65
Coppejans K.
Molchanov D.
6-16-0
Auger Aliassime F.
Majchrzak K.
5-76-46-3
Bourgue M.[6]
Sun F.
6-06-2
Wu D.
Gabashvili T.[8]
6-36-2
Doumbia S.
He Y.
6-16-3
Otte O.
Wang A.
6-16-0
De Minaur A.
Vanni L.[3]
6-746-16-4
Halys Q.[5]
Whittington A.
6-06-0
Bai Y.
Balazs A.
6-36-4
Milojevic N.
Tepavac M.
6-36-2
Quinzi G.
Kavcic B.[4]
6-46-4
Thompson J.[1]
Torebko P.
6-16-4