Steve Johnson vs Jack Sock — Houston Semi-final
Houston · ATP · Semi-final
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2017
clay
Johnson S.4-6 6-4 6-3
Sock J.
Johnson S.
4662
Sock J.
6431
Steve Johnson defeated Jack Sock 4-6 6-4 6-3 in the Houston semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jack Sock came in leading the head-to-head 5–2, defending last year's final. Steve Johnson narrowed the head-to-head to 5–3.
Key context
- Match story: Steve Johnson dropped the opening set before beating Jack Sock 4–6 6–4 6–3.
Head to head
2–5| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-21 | Miami Masters | Q2 | hard | Jack Sock | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2020-02-17 | Delray Beach | R16 | hard | Steve Johnson | 6-4 5-7 6-1 |
| 2017-02-20 | Delray Beach | QF | hard | Jack Sock | 6-4 7-6(4) |
| 2017-01-09 | Auckland | SF | hard | Jack Sock | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2015-08-03 | Washington | QF | hard | Steve Johnson | 7-6(5) 6-1 |
| 2014-05-26 | Roland Garros | R64 | clay | Jack Sock | 7-5 6-4 6-2 |
| 2012-07-16 | Atlanta | R16 | hard | Jack Sock | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
57%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
34%
35%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.3
6.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
3.9
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
52
67
Break points saved·Even
97
96
Break points won·Clear edge
10
28
Deciding sets·Clear edge
64
86
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
76
82
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Quarter-finals
Bellucci T.[8]
Querrey S.[3]
6-43-66-3
Johnson S.[4]
Verdasco F.[5]
6-26-4
Sock J.[1]
Lopez F.[6]
7-661-66-4
Escobedo E.
Isner J.[2]
7-666-767-65
R16
Isner J.[2]
Mayer L.
6-757-636-3
Escobedo E.
Monteiro T.
4-66-46-4
Querrey S.[3]
Zeballos H.
6-46-4
Bellucci T.[8]
Gonzalez M.
2-67-656-2
Verdasco F.[5]
Kicker N.
7-646-1
Johnson S.[4]
Brown D.
7-6126-4
Sock J.[1]
Haas T.
6-43-66-3
Lopez F.[6]
Chung H.
4-66-26-1
R32
Kicker N.
Rubin N.
5-3
Mayer L.
Pavlasek A.
5-76-26-1
Escobedo E.
Sandgren T.
6-36-3
Monteiro T.
Young D.[7]
6-36-4
Zeballos H.
Dutra Silva R.
6-27-5
Gonzalez M.
Donaldson J.
6-45-76-3
Bellucci T.[8]
Tiafoe F.
7-51-66-2
Brown D.
Monaco J.
7-676-3
Lopez F.[6]
Fratangelo B.
7-56-4
Chung H.
Estrella V.
6-45-76-4
Haas T.
Opelka R.
7-654-66-3
Verdasco F.[5]
Anderson K.
7-647-64