Jack Sock vs Steve Johnson — Auckland Semi-final

Auckland · ATP · Semi-final
USA4
Jack Sock
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 January 2017
hard
USA7
Steve Johnson
36 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLL
Sock J.
6-4 6-3
Johnson S.
Sock J.
662
Johnson S.
430

Jack Sock defeated Steve Johnson 6-4 6-3 in the Auckland semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jack Sock came in leading the head-to-head 4–3, defending last year's final. Jack Sock extended the head-to-head to 5–3.

Key context

  • Match story: Jack Sock closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

4–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-03-21Miami MastersQ2hardJack Sock6-2 6-2
2020-02-17Delray BeachR16hardSteve Johnson6-4 5-7 6-1
2017-04-10HoustonSFclaySteve Johnson4-6 6-4 6-3
2017-02-20Delray BeachQFhardJack Sock6-4 7-6(4)
2015-08-03WashingtonQFhardSteve Johnson7-6(5) 6-1
2014-05-26Roland GarrosR64clayJack Sock7-5 6-4 6-2
2012-07-16AtlantaR16hardJack Sock7-6(5) 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Sock J.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Johnson S.

Johnson S.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Sock J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sock J.Johnson S.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
35%
34%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.4
8.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.9
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sock J.Johnson S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
67
52
Break points saved·Even
96
97
Break points won·Clear edge
28
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
86
64
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
82
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
21°COvercast
Wind 21 km/hHumidity 53%
Final
Sock J.[4]
Sousa J.
6-35-76-3
Semi-finals
Sock J.[4]
Johnson S.[7]
6-46-3
Sousa J.
Baghdatis M.[8]
6-17-5
Quarter-finals
Johnson S.[7]
Isner J.[2]
6-35-77-63
Sock J.[4]
Chardy J.
5-76-46-3
Sousa J.
Haase R.
6-36-2
Baghdatis M.[8]
Vesely J.
6-26-4
R16
Isner J.[2]
Jaziri M.
6-33-67-66
Johnson S.[7]
Lu Y.
6-47-64
Sock J.[4]
Harrison R.
7-654-66-1
Sousa J.
Klein B.
6-36-4
Haase R.
Ferrer D.[3]
2-66-47-64
Baghdatis M.[8]
Brown D.
4-67-646-4
Vesely J.
Statham J.
6-767-56-3
Chardy J.
Lopez F.[6]
W/O
R32
Jaziri M.
Schwartzman D.
7-616-3
Lu Y.
Khachanov K.
4-67-657-69
Johnson S.[7]
Robert S.
6-46-3
Harrison R.
Garcia Lopez G.
6-16-2
Chardy J.
Sitak A.
6-46-2
Lopez F.[6]
Venus M.
3-66-46-3
Sousa J.
Ramos A.[5]
6-17-5
Klein B.
Bagnis F.
6-16-767-63
Haase R.
Tearney F.
6-47-5
Baghdatis M.[8]
Mannarino A.
6-46-4
Brown D.
Mmoh M.
7-643-66-4
Vesely J.
Zeballos H.
6-46-3