Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Ernests Gulbis — Miami Masters Qualifying Round 1
Miami Masters · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 March 2017
hard
Stakhovsky S.6-7 6-4 6-0
Gulbis E.
Stakhovsky S.
63662
Gulbis E.
77401
Sergiy Stakhovsky defeated Ernests Gulbis 6-7 6-4 6-0 in the Miami Masters qualifying round 1 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Ernests Gulbis came in leading the head-to-head 5–4. Sergiy Stakhovsky narrowed the head-to-head to 5–5.
Key context
- Match story: Sergiy Stakhovsky dropped the opening set before beating Ernests Gulbis 6–7 6–4 6–0.
Head to head
4–5| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-17 | Halle | Q1 | grass | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 7-6(5) 6-2 |
| 2019-02-11 | Rotterdam | Q1 | hard | Ernests Gulbis | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2017-03-20 | Miami Masters | Q1 | hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-0 |
| 2017-02-13 | Rotterdam | Q1 | hard | Ernests Gulbis | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-3 |
| 2015-06-15 | Halle | R32 | grass | Ernests Gulbis | 6-4 7-6(3) |
| 2014-06-23 | Wimbledon | R64 | grass | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-4 6-3 7-6(5) |
| 2012-09-14 | Davis Cup G2 R3: LAT vs UKR | RR | hard | Ernests Gulbis | 6-0 6-3 6-1 |
| 2011-02-21 | Dubai | R16 | hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 5-7 6-1 |
| 2011-01-10 | Sydney | QF | hard | Ernests Gulbis | 6-4 6-4 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Even
7.3
6.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.8
5.1
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
41
48
Break points saved·Even
88
91
Break points won·Clear edge
3
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
59
6
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Draw — qualifying
Q2
Tiafoe F.
Bourgue M.
4-66-46-4
King D.
Opelka R.
0-0
Bedene A.
Kamke T.
6-26-3
Becker B.
Youzhny M.
1-66-36-2
Harrison C.
Dutra Silva R.
7-56-2
Albot R.
Stakhovsky S.
4-66-26-4
Escobedo E.
Olivo R.
7-56-3
Kukushkin M.
Gombos N.
6-46-1
Smyczek T.
Bemelmans R.
7-56-1
Lacko L.
Kecmanovic M.
6-36-2
Lajovic D.
Kicker N.
6-46-3
Donaldson J.
Kozlov S.
7-56-3
Q1
Smyczek T.
Giraldo S.
6-46-3
Bemelmans R.
Kovalik J.
1-67-56-3
Bedene A.
Gaio F.
6-46-3
Youzhny M.
Millot V.
6-44-67-64
Kamke T.
Herbert P.
3-66-37-5
Opelka R.
Copil M.
6-47-63
King D.
Dodig I.
6-45-76-0
Dutra Silva R.
Rosol L.
6-43-67-69
Harrison C.
Polansky P.
6-46-2
Becker B.
Souza J.
6-46-787-5
Tiafoe F.
Gabashvili T.
7-626-3
Bourgue M.
Fratangelo B.
6-32-1
Albot R.
Ymer E.
6-25-1
Stakhovsky S.
Gulbis E.
6-736-46-0
Olivo R.
Bublik A.
7-56-736-1
Escobedo E.
Kudla D.
6-36-2
Kukushkin M.
Gojowczyk P.
6-40-0
Gombos N.
Halys Q.
6-41-67-62
Donaldson J.
Wu Y.
6-26-2
Kozlov S.
Kuhn N.
6-33-66-3
Kicker N.
Whittington A.
7-637-62
Lajovic D.
Zemlja G.
6-30-0
Lacko L.
Kirkov V.
6-44-66-4
Kecmanovic M.
Laaksonen H.
6-26-4