Ernests Gulbis vs Sergiy Stakhovsky — Rotterdam Qualifying Round 1
Rotterdam · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 February 2017
hard
Gulbis E.6-7 7-5 6-3
Stakhovsky S.
Gulbis E.
66762
Stakhovsky S.
78531
Ernests Gulbis defeated Sergiy Stakhovsky 6-7 7-5 6-3 in the Rotterdam qualifying round 1 on hard. The result followed the form book — Ernests Gulbis came in leading the head-to-head 5–4. Ernests Gulbis extended the head-to-head to 6–4.
Key context
- Match story: Ernests Gulbis dropped the opening set before beating Sergiy Stakhovsky 6–7 7–5 6–3.
Head to head
5–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-17 | Halle | Q1 | grass | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 7-6(5) 6-2 |
| 2019-02-11 | Rotterdam | Q1 | hard | Ernests Gulbis | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2017-03-20 | Miami Masters | Q1 | hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-0 |
| 2017-02-13 | Rotterdam | Q1 | hard | Ernests Gulbis | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-3 |
| 2015-06-15 | Halle | R32 | grass | Ernests Gulbis | 6-4 7-6(3) |
| 2014-06-23 | Wimbledon | R64 | grass | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-4 6-3 7-6(5) |
| 2012-09-14 | Davis Cup G2 R3: LAT vs UKR | RR | hard | Ernests Gulbis | 6-0 6-3 6-1 |
| 2011-02-21 | Dubai | R16 | hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 5-7 6-1 |
| 2011-01-10 | Sydney | QF | hard | Ernests Gulbis | 6-4 6-4 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Even
6.7
7.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.1
2.8
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
48
41
Break points saved·Even
91
88
Break points won·Clear edge
17
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
88
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
6
59
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast