Christian Lindell vs Inigo Cervantes Huegun — Santiago CH Round of 32
Santiago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 March 2017
clay
Lindell C.6-3 3-6 6-0
Cervantes Huegun I.
Lindell C.
6362
Cervantes Huegun I.
3601
Christian Lindell defeated Inigo Cervantes Huegun 6-3 3-6 6-0 in the Santiago CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Christian Lindell came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's round of 32. Christian Lindell extended the head-to-head to 3–0.
Key context
- Match story: Christian Lindell handed Inigo Cervantes Huegun a third-set bagel in a 6–3 3–6 6–0 win.
Head to head
2–0| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-02-02 | Quito | Q2 | clay | Christian Lindell | 6-7(2) 6-4 6-2 |
| 2014-07-07 | Bastad | R32 | clay | Christian Lindell | 6-2 6-3 |
Serve vs return
This seasonBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
52%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
46%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
5.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.3
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (59 vs 99). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Even
17
13
Break points saved·Clear edge
54
71
Break points won·Even
20
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
34
15
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
21
9
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Semi-finals
Dutra Silva R.[1]
Bolelli S.
6-46-2
Jarry N.
Clezar G.
W/O
Arevalo M.[8]
Dutra Silva R.[1]
6-36-2
Jarry N.[2]
Monteiro T.[5]
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Clezar G.
Andreozzi G.
6-42-66-3
Bolelli S.
Daniel T.[4]
6-46-4
Dutra Silva R.[1]
Lindell C.
6-14-66-2
Jarry N.
Souza J.[8]
7-657-66
Monteiro T.[5]
Berlocq C.[3]
6-30-66-4
Dutra Silva R.[1]
Heras P.
6-46-4
Jarry N.[2]
Galan D.
6-46-2
Arevalo M.[8]
Elias G.[4]
7-643-66-4
R16
Clezar G.
Kicker N.[2]
4-66-47-5
Andreozzi G.
De Greef A.[5]
6-756-46-1
Jarry N.
Gonzalez M.
6-46-4
Bolelli S.
Mayer L.
7-654-66-3
Daniel T.[4]
Garin C.
6-46-0
Dutra Silva R.[1]
Zampieri C.
6-36-3
Lindell C.
Cecchinato M.
7-664-67-65
Souza J.[8]
Ruud C.
5-76-47-5
Galan D.
Sorgi J.
6-34-66-3
Monteiro T.[5]
Carballes Baena R.
5-77-626-2
Arevalo M.[8]
Oliveira G.
6-44-67-5
Elias G.[4]
Cachin P.
6-776-47-5
Dutra Silva R.[1]
Londero J.
6-32-66-2
Berlocq C.[3]
Hernandez J.
6-16-4
Jarry N.[2]
Lama G.
7-656-2
Heras P.
Bagnis F.[6]
6-45-76-3
R32
Clezar G.
Lamasine T.
3-66-46-4
Andreozzi G.
Podlipnik Castillo H.
6-26-2
De Greef A.[5]
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
7-666-2
Gonzalez M.
Melzer G.[3]
6-46-1
Jarry N.
Varillas J.
6-16-4
Souza J.[8]
Barrios Vera T.
6-36-4
Mayer L.
Lama G.
6-36-1
Garin C.
Bourgue M.
6-46-3
Daniel T.[4]
Coria F.
6-43-66-1
Lindell C.
Cervantes Huegun I.[6]
6-33-66-0
Cecchinato M.
Hernandez J.
7-656-4
Zampieri C.
Dellien H.
6-34-66-3
Dutra Silva R.[1]
Samper Montana J.
7-56-0
Bolelli S.
Giannessi A.[7]
6-43-2
Kicker N.[2]
Janvier M.
7-646-4
Ruud C.
Soto M.
6-26-1
Galan D.
Linzer M.
0-66-22-0
Monteiro T.[5]
Marti J.
5-76-46-3
Lama G.
Clezar G.
6-42-66-3
Sorgi J.
Balazs A.[7]
6-46-2
Berlocq C.[3]
Kuzmanov D.
6-36-0
Hernandez J.
Naser J.
6-16-1
Carballes Baena R.
Souza J.
6-47-5
Oliveira G.
Rola B.
6-47-65
Cachin P.
Collarini A.
6-36-1
Elias G.[4]
Munar J.
7-656-0
Bagnis F.[6]
Gonzalez M.
7-656-0
Londero J.
Sakamoto P.
6-16-2
Dutra Silva R.[1]
Ficovich J.
6-36-4
Heras P.
Saez J.
7-636-4
Jarry N.[2]
Coria F.
6-46-4
Arevalo M.[8]
Arguello F.
6-26-1