Christian Lindell vs Inigo Cervantes Huegun — Quito Qualifying Round 2

Quito · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
SWE
Christian Lindell
34 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2015
clay
ESP
Inigo Cervantes Huegun
36 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLL
Lindell C.
6-7 6-4 6-2
Cervantes Huegun I.
Lindell C.
62662
Cervantes Huegun I.
77421

Christian Lindell defeated Inigo Cervantes Huegun 6-7 6-4 6-2 in the Quito qualifying round 2 on clay. The result followed the form book — Christian Lindell came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Christian Lindell extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-07-07BastadR32clayChristian Lindell6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Lindell C.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Cervantes Huegun I.

Cervantes Huegun I.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Lindell C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lindell C.Cervantes Huegun I.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
51%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
6.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.8
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (123 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lindell C.Cervantes Huegun I.
Clutch Rating·Even
17
13
Break points saved·Clear edge
54
71
Break points won·Even
20
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
34
15
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
21
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q3
Melzer G.[4]
Carballes Baena R.[6]
7-644-67-63
Ghem A.[5]
Londero J.
6-35-76-2
Olivo R.
Lindell C.
7-646-3
Jarry N.
Clezar G.
7-626-4
Q2
Clezar G.
Kubler J.[2]
6-47-5
Ghem A.[5]
Garin C.
6-46-2
Jarry N.
De Paula F.[8]
6-12-67-64
Olivo R.
Ungur A.[3]
6-41-66-3
Lindell C.
Cervantes Huegun I.
6-726-46-2
Londero J.
Endara I.
6-43-66-2
Carballes Baena R.[6]
Lama G.
6-36-4
Melzer G.[4]
Brunstrom J.
6-37-64
Q1
Lama G.
Monroe N.
3-66-46-3
Jarry N.
Sakamoto P.
6-47-64
Lindell C.
Becuzzi E.
6-06-1
De Paula F.[8]
Echazu M.
6-16-1
Olivo R.
Galdos S.
3-66-36-2
Carballes Baena R.[6]
Collarini A.
7-53-66-3
Ungur A.[3]
Dellien H.
6-36-4
Endara I.
Trinker B.
7-54-66-3
Melzer G.[4]
Reyes Varela M.
6-46-4
Kubler J.[2]
Marach O.
6-26-4
Cervantes Huegun I.
Ymer E.[7]
6-46-4
Garin C.
Demoliner M.
6-16-4
Ghem A.[5]
Monteiro T.
7-656-4
Clezar G.
Makiguchi R.
6-35-76-4
Brunstrom J.
Bernardi P.
6-46-4
Londero J.
De Bakker T.[1]
6-46-3