Salvatore Caruso vs Nicolas Jarry — Tempe CH Round of 32

Tempe CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Salvatore Caruso
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 February 2017
hard
Nicolas Jarry
CHI
Nicolas Jarry
#764ATP
1648ELO
1574Hard ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
Caruso S.
7-6 7-6
Jarry N.
Caruso S.
77772
Jarry N.
63630

Salvatore Caruso defeated Nicolas Jarry 7-6 7-6 in the Tempe CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Nicolas Jarry came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, but Salvatore Caruso had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 4 on hard. Salvatore Caruso claimed a first win over Nicolas Jarry in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-05-23Roland GarrosQ2clayNicolas Jarry7-6(3) 4-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Caruso S.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Jarry N.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Caruso S.

Serve advantage — Jarry N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Caruso S.Jarry N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
68%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.7
9.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Caruso S.Jarry N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
41
48
Break points saved·Dominant
65
98
Break points won·Dominant
30
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
80
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
18
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Sandgren T.
Milojevic N.
Semi-finals
Milojevic N.
Gabashvili T.[6]
7-636-4
Sandgren T.
Novikov D.[7]
4-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Gabashvili T.[6]
Kozlov S.[2]
6-36-1
Milojevic N.
Hernandez J.
4-66-17-5
Novikov D.[7]
Escobedo E.[1]
6-46-736-4
Sandgren T.
Trungelliti M.[5]
6-37-5
R16
Kozlov S.[2]
Quiroz R.
6-47-65
Gabashvili T.[6]
Santillan A.
6-757-626-2
Milojevic N.
Galan D.
7-56-3
Hernandez J.
Arevalo M.[8]
7-656-4
Trungelliti M.[5]
Sarkissian A.
5-76-46-2
Novikov D.[7]
Barry S.
6-37-69
Escobedo E.[1]
Caruso S.
6-16-4
Sandgren T.
Mmoh M.
6-43-0
R32
Kozlov S.[2]
Klahn B.
6-17-5
Quiroz R.
Mcdonald M.
3-66-36-4
Santillan A.
Zampieri C.
6-17-63
Gabashvili T.[6]
Geerts M.
6-26-3
Galan D.
Krajicek A.
6-26-746-3
Milojevic N.
Bangoura S.
6-16-4
Hernandez J.
Hannestad B.
6-46-4
Arevalo M.[8]
Schnur B.
6-06-3
Trungelliti M.[5]
Mertens Y.
6-756-46-3
Sarkissian A.
Bambridge L.
6-46-3
Sandgren T.
Coppejans K.
7-686-4
Novikov D.[7]
Gomez E.
6-24-66-4
Barry S.
Cid R.
6-36-1
Escobedo E.[1]
Ramanathan R.
6-26-3
Mmoh M.
Laaksonen H.[3]
6-14-1
Caruso S.
Jarry N.
7-637-63