Yen Hsun Lu vs Hyeon Chung — Suzhou CH Semi-final

Suzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
TPE1
Yen Hsun Lu
42 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 October 2016
hard
KOR4
Hyeon Chung
#573ATP
1488ELO
1459Hard ELO
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLW
Lu Y.
6-2 6-2
Chung H.
Lu Y.
662
Chung H.
220

Yen Hsun Lu defeated Hyeon Chung 6-2 6-2 in the Suzhou CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Yen Hsun Lu came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Yen Hsun Lu extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-08-23Winston-SalemR16hardYen Hsun Lu7-6(1) 1-6 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Lu Y.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Chung H.

Chung H.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Lu Y.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lu Y.Chung H.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
48%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.3
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lu Y.Chung H.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
34
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
88
69
Break points won·Clear edge
29
43
Deciding sets·Clear edge
33
21
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
32
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Lu Y.[1]
Kozlov S.[5]
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Lu Y.[1]
Chung H.[4]
6-26-2
Kozlov S.[5]
Kudryavtsev A.
6-30-1
Quarter-finals
Kozlov S.[5]
Stakhovsky S.[3]
3-66-27-5
Chung H.[4]
Riba P.
6-26-4
Lu Y.[1]
Arnaboldi A.
6-726-46-3
Kudryavtsev A.
Wu D.[7]
7-657-66
R16
Kudryavtsev A.
Gao X.
6-46-2
Wu D.[7]
Xia Z.
6-16-1
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Krueger M.
4-66-16-4
Kozlov S.[5]
Kim C.
6-46-3
Chung H.[4]
Eysseric J.
6-23-67-5
Arnaboldi A.
Whittington A.[8]
6-47-68
Lu Y.[1]
Rungkat C.
7-56-1
Riba P.
Kwon S.
7-657-65
R32
Kudryavtsev A.
Daniel T.[2]
7-636-3
Gao X.
Ning Y.
6-16-4
Xia Z.
Wang R.
6-36-3
Wu D.[7]
Cao Z.
6-16-1
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Ouyang B.
6-46-3
Krueger M.
Li Z.
7-56-3
Kim C.
Elgin M.
6-22-66-3
Riba P.
Ito T.[6]
6-16-4
Kwon S.
Hanfmann Y.
6-46-1
Eysseric J.
Chen T.
6-46-2
Chung H.[4]
Qi X.
6-16-1
Whittington A.[8]
Te R.
6-06-3
Rungkat C.
Kibi Y.
6-46-3
Kozlov S.[5]
He Y.
5-76-06-4
Lu Y.[1]
Masur D.
6-46-3
Arnaboldi A.
Santillan A.
7-636-4