Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Mitchell Krueger — Suzhou CH Round of 16

Suzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
UKR3
Sergiy Stakhovsky
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 October 2016
hard
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
Stakhovsky S.
4-6 6-1 6-4
Krueger M.
Stakhovsky S.
4662
Krueger M.
6141

Sergiy Stakhovsky defeated Mitchell Krueger 4-6 6-1 6-4 in the Suzhou CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Stakhovsky S.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Krueger M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Stakhovsky S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stakhovsky S.Krueger M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.3
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stakhovsky S.Krueger M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
40
16
Break points saved·Even
88
87
Break points won·Slight edge
3
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
59
0

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Stakhovsky S.Krueger M.
Freshness·
—
87

Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Lu Y.[1]
Kozlov S.[5]
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Lu Y.[1]
Chung H.[4]
6-26-2
Kozlov S.[5]
Kudryavtsev A.
6-30-1
Quarter-finals
Kozlov S.[5]
Stakhovsky S.[3]
3-66-27-5
Chung H.[4]
Riba P.
6-26-4
Lu Y.[1]
Arnaboldi A.
6-726-46-3
Kudryavtsev A.
Wu D.[7]
7-657-66
R16
Kudryavtsev A.
Gao X.
6-46-2
Wu D.[7]
Xia Z.
6-16-1
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Krueger M.
4-66-16-4
Kozlov S.[5]
Kim C.
6-46-3
Chung H.[4]
Eysseric J.
6-23-67-5
Arnaboldi A.
Whittington A.[8]
6-47-68
Lu Y.[1]
Rungkat C.
7-56-1
Riba P.
Kwon S.
7-657-65
R32
Kudryavtsev A.
Daniel T.[2]
7-636-3
Gao X.
Ning Y.
6-16-4
Xia Z.
Wang R.
6-36-3
Wu D.[7]
Cao Z.
6-16-1
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Ouyang B.
6-46-3
Krueger M.
Li Z.
7-56-3
Kim C.
Elgin M.
6-22-66-3
Riba P.
Ito T.[6]
6-16-4
Kwon S.
Hanfmann Y.
6-46-1
Eysseric J.
Chen T.
6-46-2
Chung H.[4]
Qi X.
6-16-1
Whittington A.[8]
Te R.
6-06-3
Rungkat C.
Kibi Y.
6-46-3
Kozlov S.[5]
He Y.
5-76-06-4
Lu Y.[1]
Masur D.
6-46-3
Arnaboldi A.
Santillan A.
7-636-4