Michael Mmoh vs Tommy Paul — Cary CH Round of 32

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 September 2016
hard
Tommy Paul
USA
Tommy Paul
#24ATP
1949ELO
1881Hard ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Mmoh M.
5-7 6-2 6-4
Paul T.
Mmoh M.
5662
Paul T.
7241

Michael Mmoh defeated Tommy Paul 5-7 6-2 6-4 in the Cary CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tommy Paul came in ranked #24, leading the head-to-head 2–0. Michael Mmoh claimed a first win over Tommy Paul in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-02-27AcapulcoR16hardTommy Paul6-4 2-2 RET
2019-07-22AtlantaQ1hardTommy Paul5-7 7-6(3) 7-6(3)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Paul T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Serve advantage — Paul T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Mmoh M.Paul T.
—
Serve
71
—
Return
54

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Paul T.
1st serve in·Even
65%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
54%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Even
6.0
6.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Paul T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
93
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
99
Break points won·Dominant
31
87
Deciding sets·Slight edge
90
98
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
77
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Paul T.
Freshness·Even
95
91

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Paul T.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Mcgee J.
Escobedo E.[8]
1-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Escobedo E.[8]
Tiafoe F.[2]
6-36-757-62
Mcgee J.
Novikov D.[1]
3-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Tiafoe F.[2]
Sandgren T.
6-41-67-65
Mcgee J.
Schnur B.
6-26-4
Novikov D.[1]
Polansky P.[5]
6-32-66-4
Escobedo E.[8]
Kozlov S.[4]
3-66-16-2
R16
Kozlov S.[4]
Bester P.
6-46-1
Escobedo E.[8]
Shane R.
6-35-76-1
Schnur B.
Quigley E.
7-616-1
Novikov D.[1]
Klein B.
6-46-4
Tiafoe F.[2]
Mmoh M.
5-76-46-4
Sandgren T.
Norrie C.
7-646-3
Mcgee J.
King D.[6]
6-16-3
Polansky P.[5]
Gomez E.
6-06-3
R32
Kozlov S.[4]
Crepaldi E.
3-66-46-2
Shane R.
El Mihdawy A.
6-27-65
Mmoh M.
Paul T.
5-76-26-4
Bester P.
Meister N.
7-56-3
Escobedo E.[8]
Horton N.
6-26-2
King D.[6]
Scholtz N.
6-46-4
Mcgee J.
King E.
7-57-63
Quigley E.
Quiroz R.
7-56-3
Polansky P.[5]
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Gomez E.
Stachowiak N.
6-16-3
Klein B.
Bangoura S.
1-67-56-2
Novikov D.[1]
Libietis M.
7-666-4
Norrie C.
Arevalo M.[7]
6-46-3
Sandgren T.
Mcdonald M.
6-46-3
Tiafoe F.[2]
Haviland R.
3-66-37-62
Schnur B.
Krajicek A.[3]
7-647-5