Tommy Paul vs Michael Mmoh — Acapulco Round of 16

Acapulco · ATP · Round of 16
Tommy Paul
USA7
Tommy Paul
#25ATP
1949ELO
1881Hard ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 27 February 2023
hard
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#192ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
Paul T.
6-4 2-2
Mmoh M.
Paul T.
62–
Mmoh M.
42–

Tommy Paul advanced when Michael Mmoh retired 6-4 2-2 in the Acapulco round of 16. Tommy Paul extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-07-22AtlantaQ1hardTommy Paul5-7 7-6(3) 7-6(3)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Paul T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Mmoh M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Paul T.Mmoh M.
71
Serve
—
54
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Paul T.Mmoh M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
47%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Even
6.2
6.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 138). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paul T.Mmoh M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
93
66
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
91
Break points won·Dominant
87
31
Deciding sets·Slight edge
98
90
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
96
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Paul T.
8.2
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Mmoh M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.4+282 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.6Hard Elo 1599
8.9Overall Elo 1949
ELO gap
1.1Overall Elo 1613
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
6.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
5.6
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Paul T.Mmoh M.
Freshness·Slight edge
86
93

Paul T.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Mmoh M.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
30°CClear
Wind 15 km/hHumidity 57%
Final
De Minaur A.[8]
Paul T.[7]
3-66-46-1
Semi-finals
De Minaur A.[8]
Rune H.[4]
3-67-56-2
Paul T.[7]
Fritz T.[3]
6-36-727-62
Quarter-finals
Rune H.[4]
Berrettini M.
6-01-0
Fritz T.[3]
Tiafoe F.[6]
6-36-4
De Minaur A.[8]
Daniel T.
6-26-2
Paul T.[7]
Mcdonald M.
6-26-2
R16
Paul T.[7]
Mmoh M.
6-42-2
Tiafoe F.[6]
Lopez F.
6-27-66
Rune H.[4]
Borges N.
6-06-2
Daniel T.
Ruud C.[2]
7-52-67-65
De Minaur A.[8]
Berrettini J.
6-16-0
Mcdonald M.
Nakashima B.
6-26-0
Berrettini M.
Ymer E.
6-36-3
Fritz T.[3]
Shapovalov D.
6-46-4
R32
Nakashima B.
Altmaier D.
6-33-66-1
Shapovalov D.
Kecmanovic M.
6-746-07-5
Lopez F.
Eubanks C.
7-636-4
Tiafoe F.[6]
Nishioka Y.
7-666-4
Berrettini M.
Molcan A.
6-01-0
Borges N.
Chappell N.
6-37-63
De Minaur A.[8]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-16-2
Berrettini J.
Otte O.
3-67-632-1
Ruud C.[2]
Andreozzi G.
6-44-67-62
Ymer E.
Mannarino A.
5-76-36-4
Rune H.[4]
Shelton B.
6-776-46-2
Mcdonald M.
Darderi L.
6-46-2
Mmoh M.
Giron M.
7-636-1
Paul T.[7]
Gomez E.
6-17-64
Daniel T.
Wolf J.
6-46-4
Fritz T.[3]
Isner J.
3-66-36-4