Lukas Rosol vs Jo-Wilfried TsongaDavis Cup WG QF: FRA vs CZE Round Robin

Davis Cup WG QF: FRA vs CZE · ATP · Round Robin
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
3 — 2
Sets
Friday, 15 July 2016
hard
41 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
Rosol L.
6-4 3-6 4-6 7-6 6-4
Tsonga J.
Rosol L.
63471063
Tsonga J.
4666842

Lukas Rosol defeated Jo-Wilfried Tsonga 6-4 3-6 4-6 7-6 6-4 in the Davis Cup WG QF: FRA vs CZE round robin on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jo-Wilfried Tsonga came in leading the head-to-head 4–1. Lukas Rosol narrowed the head-to-head to 4–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Lukas Rosol closed it out in five sets, 6–4 3–6 4–6 7–6 6–4.

Head to head

14
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-03-18Miami MastersQ1hardJo-Wilfried Tsonga6-3 6-4
2015-10-19ViennaR16hardLukas Rosol6-4 3-6 6-1
2015-05-03Madrid MastersR64clayJo-Wilfried Tsonga7-5 6-3
2014-09-12Davis Cup WG SF: FRA vs CZERRclayJo-Wilfried Tsonga6-2 6-2 6-3
2012-02-27DubaiR16hardJo-Wilfried Tsonga6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Rosol L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Tsonga J.

Tsonga J.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
68%
Return points won·Even
36%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
67%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.6
9.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
75
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
99
Break points won·Dominant
3
39
Deciding sets·Clear edge
77
91
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
73
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About