Frances Tiafoe vs Jason Jung — Winnetka CH Round of 32

Winnetka CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Frances Tiafoe
USA8
Frances Tiafoe
#17ATP
1918ELO
1861Hard ELO
$1.9MYTD
$18MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 July 2016
hard
Jason Jung
TPE
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
Tiafoe F.
6-3 1-6 7-5
Jung J.
Tiafoe F.
6172
Jung J.
3651

Frances Tiafoe defeated Jason Jung 6-3 1-6 7-5 in the Winnetka CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Frances Tiafoe came in ranked #17, defending last year's round of 32. Frances Tiafoe claimed a first win over Jason Jung in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Frances Tiafoe closed it out in three sets, 6–3 1–6 7–5.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-02-11New YorkR16hardJason Jung6-3 7-5
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Tiafoe F.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Jung J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tiafoe F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tiafoe F.Jung J.
38
Serve
—
37
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tiafoe F.Jung J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.0
2.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tiafoe F.Jung J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
83
21
Break points saved·Dominant
99
64
Break points won·Dominant
57
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
98
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Tiafoe F.Jung J.
Freshness·Even
82
78

Tiafoe F.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Nishioka Y.[1]
Tiafoe F.[8]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Tiafoe F.[8]
Gojowczyk P.[6]
6-47-65
Nishioka Y.[1]
Soeda G.[5]
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Soeda G.[5]
Dancevic F.
7-636-2
Nishioka Y.[1]
Sarkissian A.
6-26-4
Tiafoe F.[8]
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Gojowczyk P.[6]
Kuznetsov A.
6-36-4
R16
Kuznetsov A.
Meister N.
6-36-2
Krueger M.
Krajicek A.[3]
7-53-66-4
Tiafoe F.[8]
Mitchell B.
7-56-3
Soeda G.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-36-2
Gojowczyk P.[6]
Barry S.
6-46-2
Dancevic F.
Chiudinelli M.[4]
6-36-2
Sarkissian A.
Smith J.[7]
7-666-1
Nishioka Y.[1]
Nguyen D.
6-36-3
R32
Smith J.[7]
Duckworth J.
6-46-726-1
Kuznetsov A.
Smyczek T.[2]
7-636-4
Meister N.
Golubev A.
6-26-3
Barry S.
Shane R.
7-676-1
Gojowczyk P.[6]
Fawcett T.
3-66-07-64
Tiafoe F.[8]
Jung J.
6-31-67-5
Chiudinelli M.[4]
Rybakov A.
7-646-3
Krajicek A.[3]
Nevolo D.
6-37-65
Krueger M.
Hiltzik J.
7-643-66-4
Mitchell B.
Escobedo E.
6-43-67-5
Soeda G.[5]
Mcdonald M.
7-606-4
Kozlov S.
Bangoura S.
6-43-66-2
Dancevic F.
Barton M.
6-46-4
Sarkissian A.
Weintraub A.
6-756-16-3
Nguyen D.
Bossel A.
6-36-3
Nishioka Y.[1]
Kavcic B.
6-06-4