Jason Jung vs Frances Tiafoe — New York Round of 16

New York · ATP · Round of 16
Jason Jung
TPE
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 February 2019
hard
Frances Tiafoe
USA2
Frances Tiafoe
#17ATP
1918ELO
1861Hard ELO
$1.9MYTD
$18MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
Jung J.
6-3 7-5
Tiafoe F.
Jung J.
672
Tiafoe F.
350

Jason Jung defeated Frances Tiafoe 6-3 7-5 in the New York round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Frances Tiafoe came in ranked #17, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Jung closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jung J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tiafoe F.

Tiafoe F.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Jung J.Tiafoe F.
—
Serve
38
—
Return
37

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Jung J.Tiafoe F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.8
8.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jung J.Tiafoe F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
21
83
Break points saved·Dominant
64
99
Break points won·Dominant
8
57
Deciding sets·Dominant
21
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Jung J.Tiafoe F.
Freshness·Even
75
79

Jung J.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d) · Tiafoe F.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Opelka R.
Schnur B.
6-16-777-67
Semi-finals
Opelka R.
Isner J.[1]
6-787-6147-64
Schnur B.
Querrey S.[6]
7-674-66-3
Quarter-finals
Opelka R.
Garcia Lopez G.
6-36-4
Isner J.[1]
Thompson J.[7]
6-46-1
Querrey S.[6]
Jung J.
6-33-66-3
Schnur B.
Lorenzi P.
6-777-657-5
R16
Opelka R.
Istomin D.
6-787-661-0
Jung J.
Tiafoe F.[2]
6-37-5
Querrey S.[6]
Albot R.
6-36-4
Thompson J.[7]
Eubanks C.
4-66-16-4
Isner J.[1]
Tomic B.
7-676-4
Garcia Lopez G.
Millman J.[4]
7-641-66-4
Schnur B.
Johnson S.[3]
6-44-67-64
Lorenzi P.
Harrison R.
4-66-46-4
R32
Albot R.
Karlovic I.
6-747-647-65
Istomin D.
Mcdonald M.
4-66-26-3
Thompson J.[7]
Rubin N.
6-777-56-1
Jung J.
Ramanathan R.
6-33-66-1
Tomic B.
Lacko L.
6-46-2
Eubanks C.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-47-64
Querrey S.[6]
Harris L.
7-626-2
Garcia Lopez G.
Popyrin A.
7-666-3
Opelka R.
Mannarino A.[5]
2-67-656-4
Schnur B.
Lin J.
6-16-3
Lorenzi P.
Sandgren T.[8]
7-646-746-4
Harrison R.
Polansky P.
6-36-4