Horacio Zeballos vs Nicolas Jarry — Bucaramanga CH Round of 32

Bucaramanga CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG7
Horacio Zeballos
41 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 January 2016
clay
Nicolas Jarry
CHI
Nicolas Jarry
#764ATP
1648ELO
1642Clay ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
Zeballos H.
7-6 7-5
Jarry N.
Zeballos H.
7772
Jarry N.
6150

Horacio Zeballos defeated Nicolas Jarry 7-6 7-5 in the Bucaramanga CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Nicolas Jarry came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Horacio Zeballos claimed a first win over Nicolas Jarry in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-02-26Sao PauloSFclayNicolas Jarry6-7(5) 6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Zeballos H.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Jarry N.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Zeballos H.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zeballos H.Jarry N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
68%
Return points won·Even
35%
34%
Break points saved·Even
62%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.9
9.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (168 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zeballos H.Jarry N.
Clutch Rating·Even
45
48
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
98
Break points won·Clear edge
17
4
Deciding sets·Even
57
57
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
58
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Melzer G.
Lorenzi P.[2]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Lorenzi P.[2]
Zeballos H.[7]
6-35-76-3
Melzer G.
Bourgue M.
6-47-66
Quarter-finals
Melzer G.
Struvay E.
6-47-65
Bourgue M.
Estrella V.[1]
6-17-65
Zeballos H.[7]
Samper Montana J.
6-37-64
Lorenzi P.[2]
Elias G.[8]
6-43-67-66
R16
Lorenzi P.[2]
Andreozzi G.
6-16-2
Elias G.[8]
Clezar G.
2-66-46-4
Samper Montana J.
Kicker N.
6-727-56-4
Zeballos H.[7]
Arguello F.
6-33-66-4
Melzer G.
Podlipnik Castillo H.
6-43-66-2
Struvay E.
Trinker B.
6-46-1
Estrella V.[1]
Hernandez J.
6-34-67-5
Bourgue M.
Cachin P.
6-46-3
R32
Lorenzi P.[2]
Martin A.
6-32-66-3
Andreozzi G.
Hemery C.
6-36-2
Arguello F.
Barrientos N.
7-51-0
Melzer G.
Estevez M.
3-67-56-1
Struvay E.
Gonzalez A.
3-67-56-3
Trinker B.
Montanes A.[4]
6-736-46-4
Cachin P.
Falla A.[6]
7-606-3
Bourgue M.
Riba P.
6-46-3
Hernandez J.
Galan D.
6-26-3
Estrella V.[1]
De Greef A.
7-656-3
Clezar G.
Lapentti G.
6-27-5
Elias G.[8]
Lindell C.
6-46-1
Kicker N.
Bagnis F.[3]
6-34-67-68
Samper Montana J.
Paul T.
6-36-3
Zeballos H.[7]
Jarry N.
7-617-5
Podlipnik Castillo H.
Dutra Silva R.[5]
6-46-4