Marius Copil vs Edouard Roger-Vasselin — Bratislava CH Quarter-final

Bratislava CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 November 2015
hard
FRA8
Edouard Roger-Vasselin
42 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLWW
Copil M.
7-6 5-7 6-3
Roger-Vasselin E.
Copil M.
77562
Roger-Vasselin E.
65731

Marius Copil defeated Edouard Roger-Vasselin 7-6 5-7 6-3 in the Bratislava CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Marius Copil came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Marius Copil extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Marius Copil closed it out in three sets, 7–6 5–7 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-08-31US OpenQ1hardMarius Copil6-2 4-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Roger-Vasselin E.

Roger-Vasselin E.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Roger-Vasselin E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 67). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Copil M.Roger-Vasselin E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
47
22
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
82
Break points won·Clear edge
3
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Gerasimov E.
Lacko L.[4]
7-617-65
Semi-finals
Gerasimov E.
Copil M.
7-642-66-2
Lacko L.[4]
Marchenko I.[2]
6-43-67-67
Quarter-finals
Gerasimov E.
Gombos N.[6]
7-626-7127-65
Copil M.
Roger-Vasselin E.[8]
7-655-76-3
Lacko L.[4]
Vatutin A.
6-26-2
Marchenko I.[2]
Stepanek R.
4-66-46-3
R16
Gerasimov E.
Rosol L.[1]
6-37-64
Gombos N.[6]
Gojowczyk P.
6-37-5
Copil M.
Struff J.[3]
6-46-3
Roger-Vasselin E.[8]
Youzhny M.
6-47-63
Vatutin A.
Smirnov A.
3-67-667-61
Lacko L.[4]
Rublev A.
6-757-616-4
Stepanek R.
Ignatik U.
6-36-4
Marchenko I.[2]
Satral J.
6-46-4
R32
Rosol L.[1]
Brands D.
7-6146-3
Roger-Vasselin E.[8]
Przysiezny M.
4-2
Rublev A.
Pavlasek A.
6-40-0
Gerasimov E.
Weintraub A.
6-26-1
Gojowczyk P.
Celikbilek A.
7-56-1
Gombos N.[6]
Karatsev A.
6-36-3
Struff J.[3]
Sijsling I.
7-656-4
Copil M.
Kalenichenko D.
6-36-4
Youzhny M.
Blasko M.
6-46-0
Vatutin A.
Dustov F.[5]
6-36-4
Smirnov A.
Nedovyesov A.
6-17-67
Lacko L.[4]
Ymer M.
6-46-2
Stepanek R.
Ymer E.[7]
6-47-65
Ignatik U.
Molcan A.
4-66-36-3
Satral J.
Kovalik J.
6-737-686-4
Marchenko I.[2]
Pavic A.
7-666-4