Egor Gerasimov vs Marius Copil — Bratislava CH Semi-final

Bratislava CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
BLR
Egor Gerasimov
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 November 2015
hard
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Gerasimov E.
7-6 2-6 6-2
Copil M.
Gerasimov E.
77262
Copil M.
64621

Egor Gerasimov defeated Marius Copil 7-6 2-6 6-2 in the Bratislava CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Egor Gerasimov came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Egor Gerasimov extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Egor Gerasimov closed it out in three sets, 7–6 2–6 6–2.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-10-01TokyoQ1hardEgor Gerasimov6-4 6-3
2017-02-03Davis Cup G1 R1: ROU vs BLRRRhardEgor Gerasimov6-3 6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Gerasimov E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Copil M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Gerasimov E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gerasimov E.Copil M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
75%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
8.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gerasimov E.Copil M.
Clutch Rating·Even
44
47
Break points saved·Even
88
91
Break points won·Slight edge
8
3
Deciding sets·Slight edge
70
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
40
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Gerasimov E.
Lacko L.[4]
7-617-65
Semi-finals
Gerasimov E.
Copil M.
7-642-66-2
Lacko L.[4]
Marchenko I.[2]
6-43-67-67
Quarter-finals
Gerasimov E.
Gombos N.[6]
7-626-7127-65
Copil M.
Roger-Vasselin E.[8]
7-655-76-3
Lacko L.[4]
Vatutin A.
6-26-2
Marchenko I.[2]
Stepanek R.
4-66-46-3
R16
Gerasimov E.
Rosol L.[1]
6-37-64
Gombos N.[6]
Gojowczyk P.
6-37-5
Copil M.
Struff J.[3]
6-46-3
Roger-Vasselin E.[8]
Youzhny M.
6-47-63
Vatutin A.
Smirnov A.
3-67-667-61
Lacko L.[4]
Rublev A.
6-757-616-4
Stepanek R.
Ignatik U.
6-36-4
Marchenko I.[2]
Satral J.
6-46-4
R32
Rosol L.[1]
Brands D.
7-6146-3
Roger-Vasselin E.[8]
Przysiezny M.
4-2
Rublev A.
Pavlasek A.
6-40-0
Gerasimov E.
Weintraub A.
6-26-1
Gojowczyk P.
Celikbilek A.
7-56-1
Gombos N.[6]
Karatsev A.
6-36-3
Struff J.[3]
Sijsling I.
7-656-4
Copil M.
Kalenichenko D.
6-36-4
Youzhny M.
Blasko M.
6-46-0
Vatutin A.
Dustov F.[5]
6-36-4
Smirnov A.
Nedovyesov A.
6-17-67
Lacko L.[4]
Ymer M.
6-46-2
Stepanek R.
Ymer E.[7]
6-47-65
Ignatik U.
Molcan A.
4-66-36-3
Satral J.
Kovalik J.
6-737-686-4
Marchenko I.[2]
Pavic A.
7-666-4