Samantha Stosur vs Monica Puig — Hong Kong Round of 16

Hong Kong · WTA · Round of 16
AUS5
Samantha Stosur
42 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 October 2015
hard
PUR
Monica Puig
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLL
Stosur S.
6-4 6-4
Puig M.
Stosur S.
662
Puig M.
440

Samantha Stosur defeated Monica Puig 6-4 6-4 in the Hong Kong round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Monica Puig came in defending last year's round of 16. Samantha Stosur extended the head-to-head to 4–3.

Key context

  • Match story: Samantha Stosur edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

3–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-03-19MiamiR128hardMonica Puig6-3 6-4
2018-01-15Australian OpenR128hardMonica Puig4-6 7-6(6) 6-4
2016-01-11SydneyQFhardMonica Puig6-4 6-4
2015-05-18StrasbourgR32claySamantha Stosur6-0 6-3
2014-08-04MontrealR64hardSamantha Stosur6-2 6-2
2014-05-26Roland GarrosR128claySamantha Stosur6-1 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Stosur S.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Puig M.

Puig M.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Stosur S.

Serve advantage — Puig M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stosur S.Puig M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
48%
Service points won·Even
58%
58%
Return points won·Even
41%
44%
Break points saved·Even
57%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
3.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.0
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stosur S.Puig M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
45
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
85
63
Break points won·Even
61
62
Deciding sets·Slight edge
45
55
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
47
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Jankovic J.[4]
Kerber A.[2]
3-67-646-1
Semi-finals
Jankovic J.[4]
Williams V.[3]
6-47-5
Kerber A.[2]
Stosur S.[5]
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Jankovic J.[4]
Saville D.[6]
6-16-1
Stosur S.[5]
Watson H.
4-66-36-0
Williams V.[3]
Cornet A.[8]
6-16-1
Kerber A.[2]
Garcia C.[7]
7-56-3
R16
Williams V.[3]
Wang Y.
6-06-2
Stosur S.[5]
Puig M.
6-46-4
Garcia C.[7]
Komardina A.
6-06-2
Cornet A.[8]
Shvedova Y.
6-746-36-4
Jankovic J.[4]
Rodionova A.
6-06-2
Saville D.[6]
Arruabarrena L.
7-646-1
Watson H.
Lee Y.
6-06-756-4
Kerber A.[2]
Nara K.
6-26-2
R32
Watson H.
Zhang K.
3-66-16-2
Shvedova Y.
Gajdosova J.
6-46-4
Cornet A.[8]
Baindl K.
6-46-0
Jankovic J.[4]
Bogdan A.
6-46-2
Rodionova A.
Ramialison I.
6-47-5
Arruabarrena L.
Falconi I.
6-46-3
Lee Y.
Jang S.
6-36-1
Puig M.
Kumkhum L.
6-16-2
Stosur S.[5]
Ozaki R.
6-36-1
Komardina A.
Chang K.
6-47-5
Kerber A.[2]
Schiavone F.
6-746-26-3
Wang Y.
Mchale C.
6-34-1
Williams V.[3]
Beygelzimer Y.
2-66-46-4
Saville D.[6]
Kato M.
6-767-56-3
Nara K.
Zhang L.
6-06-3
Garcia C.[7]
Davis L.
6-16-3