Carla Suarez Navarro vs Monica Puig — Beijing Round of 32
Beijing · WTA · Round of 32
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 October 2015
hard
Suarez Navarro C.7-6 6-2
Puig M.
Suarez Navarro C.
7762
Puig M.
6120
Carla Suarez Navarro defeated Monica Puig 7-6 6-2 in the Beijing round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Carla Suarez Navarro came in leading the head-to-head 4–1, defending last year's round of 16. Carla Suarez Navarro extended the head-to-head to 5–1.
Key context
- Match story: Carla Suarez Navarro closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.
Head to head
4–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-20 | New Haven | SF | hard | Carla Suarez Navarro | 4-4 RET |
| 2015-03-09 | Indian Wells | R64 | hard | Carla Suarez Navarro | 6-1 6-1 |
| 2014-07-28 | Stanford | R32 | hard | Monica Puig | 6-3 7-5 |
| 2013-05-27 | Roland Garros | R32 | clay | Carla Suarez Navarro | 6-4 7-5 |
| 2013-04-29 | Oeiras | QF | clay | Carla Suarez Navarro | 6-2 6-4 |
Serve vs return
This seasonBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
57%
58%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Even
55%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.2
3.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
3.4
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
59
36
Break points saved·Slight edge
57
63
Break points won·Clear edge
85
62
Deciding sets·Clear edge
67
55
Tiebreaks·Dominant
83
30
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
23°CClear
Wind 7 km/hHumidity 57%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Muguruza G.[5]
Mattek Sands B.
6-17-5
Radwanska A.[4]
Kerber A.[10]
6-16-4
Ivanovic A.[6]
Pavlyuchenkova A.
6-37-5
Bacsinszky T.[12]
Errani S.
0-66-37-5
R16
Mattek Sands B.
Vinci R.[15]
6-13-66-2
Muguruza G.[5]
Lucic M.
1-66-26-1
Kerber A.[10]
Wozniacki C.[8]
6-26-3
Ivanovic A.[6]
Kuznetsova S.
7-54-66-2
Pavlyuchenkova A.
Pennetta F.[3]
3-66-46-3
Bacsinszky T.[12]
Suarez Navarro C.[7]
6-44-67-5
Errani S.
Petkovic A.[13]
3-66-36-2
Radwanska A.[4]
Keys M.[14]
6-3
R32
Mattek Sands B.
Arruabarrena L.
0-66-26-0
Vinci R.[15]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-26-2
Muguruza G.[5]
Falconi I.
6-26-1
Radwanska A.[4]
Barthel M.
4-66-16-4
Keys M.[14]
Bondarenko K.
3-66-16-0
Kerber A.[10]
Cibulkova D.
6-16-4
Ivanovic A.[6]
Williams V.
7-636-2
Kuznetsova S.
Stephens S.
3-66-36-4
Pavlyuchenkova A.
Svitolina E.[16]
6-41-66-3
Pennetta F.[3]
Pereira T.
3-66-06-4
Suarez Navarro C.[7]
Puig M.
7-616-2
Bacsinszky T.[12]
Duque Marino M.
7-56-2
Petkovic A.[13]
Stosur S.
6-27-5
Errani S.
Garcia C.
6-43-66-1
Lucic M.
Bencic B.[11]
W/O
Wozniacki C.[8]
Wang Q.
7-56-0
R64
Stephens S.
Pliskova K.[9]
6-36-2
Arruabarrena L.
Halep S.[1]
5-4
Puig M.
Diyas Z.
6-4
Falconi I.
Saville D.
7-52-66-4
Barthel M.
Zhang S.
6-36-2
Bondarenko K.
Strycova B.
6-36-2
Keys M.[14]
Mladenovic K.
7-56-2
Cibulkova D.
Jankovic J.
6-11-66-3
Wang Q.
Lepchenko V.
6-23-66-2
Wozniacki C.[8]
Jovanovski B.
6-26-4
Kuznetsova S.
Witthoeft C.
6-46-4
Pavlyuchenkova A.
Goerges J.
6-26-4
Pereira T.
Dulgheru A.
7-56-2
Bacsinszky T.[12]
Giorgi C.
1-66-46-3
Stosur S.
Niculescu M.
6-36-2
Garcia C.
Zheng S.
6-26-2
Errani S.
Kvitova P.[2]
7-56-4
Radwanska A.[4]
Vandeweghe C.
6-3
Suarez Navarro C.[7]
Tsurenko L.
6-3
Petkovic A.[13]
Bouchard E.
6-21-1
Pennetta F.[3]
Han X.
7-54-66-4
Van Uytvanck A.
Schmiedlova A.
6-26-4
Lucic M.
Begu I.
6-13-66-3
Ivanovic A.[6]
Dellacqua C.
6-46-0
Svitolina E.[16]
Putintseva Y.
7-56-2
Duque Marino M.
Pironkova T.
6-36-3
Mattek Sands B.
Cornet A.
6-36-3
Bencic B.[11]
Brengle M.
6-746-46-3