Monica Puig vs Carla Suarez NavarroStanford Round of 32

Stanford · WTA · Round of 32
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 July 2014
hard
37 yrs · 162 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLWLW
Puig M.
6-3 7-5
Suarez Navarro C.
Puig M.
672
Suarez Navarro C.
350

Monica Puig defeated Carla Suarez Navarro 6-3 7-5 in the Stanford round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Carla Suarez Navarro came in leading the head-to-head 5–0. Monica Puig claimed a first win over Carla Suarez Navarro in six meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 5–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Monica Puig closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

05
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-08-20New HavenSFhardCarla Suarez Navarro4-4 RET
2015-10-05BeijingR32hardCarla Suarez Navarro7-6(1) 6-2
2015-03-09Indian WellsR64hardCarla Suarez Navarro6-1 6-1
2013-05-27Roland GarrosR32clayCarla Suarez Navarro6-4 7-5
2013-04-29OeirasQFclayCarla Suarez Navarro6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Puig M.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Suarez Navarro C.

Suarez Navarro C.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Puig M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
58%
57%
Return points won·Even
44%
45%
Break points saved·Even
56%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.1
1.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
59
Break points saved·Slight edge
63
57
Break points won·Clear edge
62
85
Deciding sets·Clear edge
55
67
Tiebreaks·Dominant
30
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast