Lukas Rosol vs Ernests Gulbis — Winston-Salem Round of 64

Winston-Salem · ATP · Round of 64
CZE
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 23 August 2015
hard
LAT
Ernests Gulbis
37 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWLLL
Rosol L.
6-4 7-6
Gulbis E.
Rosol L.
6772
Gulbis E.
4640

Lukas Rosol defeated Ernests Gulbis 6-4 7-6 in the Winston-Salem round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Lukas Rosol came in leading the head-to-head 3–1, defending the title. Lukas Rosol extended the head-to-head to 4–1.

Key context

Head to head

3–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-02-03PuneQ1hardLukas Rosol6-4 6-4
2015-08-10Canada MastersR32hardErnests Gulbis6-2 5-7 6-3
2015-06-29WimbledonR128grassLukas Rosol7-6(2) 6-3 7-6(4)
2011-10-24St. PetersburgR32carpetLukas Rosol6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Rosol L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gulbis E.

Gulbis E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rosol L.Gulbis E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.6
6.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.3
5.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosol L.Gulbis E.
Clutch Rating·Even
51
48
Break points saved·Even
89
91
Break points won·Clear edge
3
16
Deciding sets·Slight edge
78
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Anderson K.[2]
Herbert P.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Herbert P.
Johnson S.[13]
3-67-656-2
Anderson K.[2]
Jaziri M.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Johnson S.[13]
Lu Y.
W/O
Herbert P.
Carreno Busta P.
4-67-656-2
Jaziri M.
Bellucci T.[6]
6-36-2
Anderson K.[2]
Coric B.[8]
6-27-61
R16
Lu Y.
Chung H.
7-611-67-5
Herbert P.
Bedene A.
6-36-0
Carreno Busta P.
Bolelli S.
6-44-66-1
Johnson S.[13]
Tsonga J.[3]
6-34-67-64
Jaziri M.
Gabashvili T.[15]
7-56-4
Anderson K.[2]
Janowicz J.[16]
7-626-4
Coric B.[8]
Schwartzman D.
6-26-1
Bellucci T.[6]
Vesely J.[11]
6-16-776-4
R32
Herbert P.
Baghdatis M.[14]
6-32-67-5
Tsonga J.[3]
Istomin D.
5-76-46-1
Johnson S.[13]
Groth S.
6-46-746-1
Lu Y.
Garcia Lopez G.[5]
6-36-3
Vesely J.[11]
Klizan M.
6-36-4
Jaziri M.
Troicki V.[4]
6-44-66-4
Coric B.[8]
Giraldo S.
4-66-26-2
Schwartzman D.
Andujar P.[12]
4-67-57-5
Janowicz J.[16]
Rosol L.
6-36-2
Bedene A.
Simon G.[1]
6-757-657-66
Bolelli S.
Querrey S.[7]
7-676-747-69
Gabashvili T.[15]
Kokkinakis T.
7-656-757-63
Anderson K.[2]
Kukushkin M.
4-66-26-3
Bellucci T.[6]
Tiafoe F.
6-32-67-62
Chung H.
Paire B.[9]
6-16-4
Carreno Busta P.
Sousa J.[10]
6-46-4
R64
Carreno Busta P.
Haas T.
6-36-4
Bolelli S.
Delbonis F.
6-46-3
Istomin D.
Young D.
6-36-3
Chung H.
Ward J.
6-776-46-3
Lu Y.
Haase R.
7-646-2
Klizan M.
Ilhan M.
7-616-2
Jaziri M.
Souza J.
6-36-4
Schwartzman D.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-47-68
Kukushkin M.
Mahut N.
6-46-746-0
Bedene A.
Cecchinato M.
6-26-2
Groth S.
Donaldson J.
6-747-687-65
Kokkinakis T.
Dolgopolov A.
7-617-65
Giraldo S.
Darcis S.
2-0
Herbert P.
Stakhovsky S.
6-36-2
Tiafoe F.
Duckworth J.
3-67-647-63
Rosol L.
Gulbis E.
6-47-64