Ernests Gulbis vs Lukas Rosol — Canada Masters Round of 32

Canada Masters · ATP · Round of 32
LAT
Ernests Gulbis
37 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 August 2015
hard
CZE
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
Gulbis E.
6-2 5-7 6-3
Rosol L.
Gulbis E.
6562
Rosol L.
2731

Ernests Gulbis defeated Lukas Rosol 6-2 5-7 6-3 in the Canada Masters round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Lukas Rosol came in leading the head-to-head 4–0. Ernests Gulbis claimed a first win over Lukas Rosol in five meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 4–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Ernests Gulbis closed it out in three sets, 6–2 5–7 6–3.

Head to head

0–4
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-02-03PuneQ1hardLukas Rosol6-4 6-4
2015-08-23Winston-SalemR64hardLukas Rosol6-4 7-6(4)
2015-06-29WimbledonR128grassLukas Rosol7-6(2) 6-3 7-6(4)
2011-10-24St. PetersburgR32carpetLukas Rosol6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Gulbis E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Rosol L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gulbis E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gulbis E.Rosol L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.8
4.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.1
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gulbis E.Rosol L.
Clutch Rating·Even
48
51
Break points saved·Even
91
89
Break points won·Clear edge
17
3
Deciding sets·Slight edge
88
77
Tiebreaks·Dominant
6
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
23°COvercast
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 63%
Final
Murray A.[2]
Djokovic N.[1]
6-44-66-3
Semi-finals
Djokovic N.[1]
Chardy J.
6-46-4
Murray A.[2]
Nishikori K.[4]
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Djokovic N.[1]
Gulbis E.
5-77-676-1
Nishikori K.[4]
Nadal R.[7]
6-26-4
Murray A.[2]
Tsonga J.[10]
6-46-4
Chardy J.
Isner J.[16]
6-797-6137-64
R16
Djokovic N.[1]
Sock J.
6-26-1
Gulbis E.
Young D.
6-46-4
Nadal R.[7]
Youzhny M.
6-36-3
Tsonga J.[10]
Tomic B.
7-676-3
Murray A.[2]
Muller G.
6-36-2
Chardy J.
Karlovic I.
4-67-616-4
Isner J.[16]
Kyrgios N.
7-56-3
Nishikori K.[4]
Goffin D.[13]
6-46-4
R32
Kyrgios N.
Wawrinka S.[3]
6-786-34-0
Karlovic I.
Raonic M.[8]
7-617-61
Djokovic N.[1]
Bellucci T.
6-37-64
Gulbis E.
Rosol L.
6-25-76-3
Young D.
Berdych T.[5]
7-656-3
Isner J.[16]
Pospisil V.
7-614-66-3
Chardy J.
Mayer L.
4-67-646-2
Nadal R.[7]
Stakhovsky S.
7-646-3
Youzhny M.
Simon G.[9]
6-16-4
Goffin D.[13]
Querrey S.
6-46-4
Nishikori K.[4]
Andujar P.
6-36-3
Tsonga J.[10]
Bautista Agut R.
5-77-667-5
Murray A.[2]
Robredo T.
6-47-5
Tomic B.
Cilic M.[6]
6-36-4
Sock J.
Dimitrov G.[14]
5-77-657-5
Muller G.
Monfils G.[15]
6-33-67-64
R64
Bellucci T.
Cuevas P.
7-644-67-64
Sock J.
Mannarino A.
6-22-67-65
Kyrgios N.
Verdasco F.
6-34-66-4
Pospisil V.
Lu Y.
6-46-3
Isner J.[16]
Becker B.
6-46-766-3
Mayer L.
Chung H.
6-36-4
Youzhny M.
Troicki V.
6-37-5
Simon G.[9]
Seppi A.
6-26-4
Goffin D.[13]
Johnson S.
6-26-2
Querrey S.
Klizan M.
6-36-3
Andujar P.
Dancevic F.
6-26-4
Bautista Agut R.
Tipsarevic J.
6-36-4
Monfils G.[15]
Fognini F.
6-36-1
Muller G.
Bester P.
6-26-3
Tsonga J.[10]
Coric B.
6-46-4
Young D.
Kudla D.
6-36-4
Rosol L.
Anderson K.[12]
7-627-64
Gulbis E.
Thiem D.
3-67-686-1
Tomic B.
Sousa J.
6-36-3
Stakhovsky S.
Peliwo F.
6-15-76-2
Karlovic I.
Janowicz J.
6-47-66
Robredo T.
Lopez F.
6-33-66-3
Dimitrov G.[14]
Dolgopolov A.
6-47-5
Chardy J.
Mahut N.
6-17-5