Gilles Simon vs Jack Sock — Rome Masters Round of 64

Rome Masters · ATP · Round of 64
FRA12
Gilles Simon
41 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 10 May 2015
clay
USA
Jack Sock
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Simon G.
4-6 7-6 6-3
Sock J.
Simon G.
47762
Sock J.
66231

Gilles Simon defeated Jack Sock 4-6 7-6 6-3 in the Rome Masters round of 64 on clay. The result followed the form book — Gilles Simon came in defending last year's round of 32. Gilles Simon extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-10-10Shanghai MastersQFhardGilles Simon4-6 6-4 7-6(5)
2015-10-19StockholmQFhardJack Sock7-5 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Simon G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Sock J.

Sock J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Simon G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Simon G.Sock J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.8
6.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Simon G.Sock J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
74
67
Break points saved·Even
94
96
Break points won·Dominant
68
28
Deciding sets·Clear edge
73
86
Tiebreaks·Even
82
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
26°CClear
Wind 15 km/hHumidity 42%
Final
Djokovic N.[1]
Federer R.[2]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Djokovic N.[1]
Ferrer D.[7]
6-46-4
Federer R.[2]
Wawrinka S.[8]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Djokovic N.[1]
Nishikori K.[5]
6-33-66-1
Ferrer D.[7]
Goffin D.
6-24-66-3
Wawrinka S.[8]
Nadal R.[4]
7-676-2
Federer R.[2]
Berdych T.[6]
6-36-3
R16
Djokovic N.[1]
Bellucci T.
5-76-26-3
Nishikori K.[5]
Troicki V.
6-46-3
Ferrer D.[7]
Garcia Lopez G.
6-16-3
Wawrinka S.[8]
Thiem D.
7-636-4
Nadal R.[4]
Isner J.[16]
6-46-4
Berdych T.[6]
Fognini F.
6-33-67-62
Federer R.[2]
Anderson K.[15]
6-37-5
Goffin D.
Murray A.[3]
W/O
R32
Thiem D.
Simon G.[12]
7-652-0
Bellucci T.
Bautista Agut R.[14]
1-66-16-4
Nishikori K.[5]
Vesely J.
7-637-5
Goffin D.
Tsonga J.[13]
6-24-67-5
Ferrer D.[7]
Gasquet R.
6-47-5
Wawrinka S.[8]
Monaco J.
4-66-36-2
Isner J.[16]
Mayer L.
7-666-4
Fognini F.
Dimitrov G.[10]
7-694-66-0
Garcia Lopez G.
Dolgopolov A.
6-46-3
Berdych T.[6]
Donati M.
6-26-4
Troicki V.
Lopez F.[11]
6-726-46-3
Federer R.[2]
Cuevas P.
7-636-4
Anderson K.[15]
Kohlschreiber P.
3-0
Nadal R.[4]
Ilhan M.
6-26-0
Djokovic N.[1]
Almagro N.
6-16-756-3
Murray A.[3]
Chardy J.
6-46-3
R64
Thiem D.
Bolelli S.
7-647-65
Almagro N.
Vanni L.
6-46-3
Vesely J.
Gulbis E.
7-642-66-3
Chardy J.
Rosol L.
7-606-4
Tsonga J.[13]
Querrey S.
7-666-0
Dolgopolov A.
Klizan M.
6-46-1
Simon G.[12]
Sock J.
4-67-626-3
Isner J.[16]
Sousa J.
7-56-3
Donati M.
Giraldo S.
2-66-16-4
Fognini F.
Johnson S.
7-606-3
Dimitrov G.[10]
Janowicz J.
6-37-64
Anderson K.[15]
Mayer F.
7-634-67-64
Kohlschreiber P.
Young D.
6-46-1
Goffin D.
Arnaboldi A.
5-76-26-1
Garcia Lopez G.
Cilic M.[9]
6-46-3
Gasquet R.
Fabbiano T.
6-17-60
Bautista Agut R.[14]
Granollers M.
6-16-3
Cuevas P.
Lorenzi P.
6-36-2
Bellucci T.
Schwartzman D.
6-44-3
Troicki V.
Tomic B.
7-636-747-64
Monaco J.
Lajovic D.
6-36-756-2
Ilhan M.
Mannarino A.
6-46-1
Mayer L.
Gaio F.
6-36-4
Lopez F.[11]
Kyrgios N.
6-47-64