Nicolas Jarry vs Pedro Sakamoto — Quito Qualifying Round 1

Quito · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
Nicolas Jarry
CHI
Nicolas Jarry
#764ATP
1648ELO
1642Clay ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2015
clay
Pedro Sakamoto
BRA
Pedro Sakamoto
#494ATP
1281ELO
1266Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
Jarry N.
6-4 7-6
Sakamoto P.
Jarry N.
6772
Sakamoto P.
4640

Nicolas Jarry defeated Pedro Sakamoto 6-4 7-6 in the Quito qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jarry N.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Sakamoto P.

Sakamoto P.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Serve advantage — Jarry N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jarry N.Sakamoto P.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.9
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jarry N.Sakamoto P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
48
13
Break points saved·Dominant
98
48
Break points won·Clear edge
4
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
11
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
79
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Jarry N.Sakamoto P.
Freshness·
—
94

Sakamoto P.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 13 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q3
Melzer G.[4]
Carballes Baena R.[6]
7-644-67-63
Ghem A.[5]
Londero J.
6-35-76-2
Olivo R.
Lindell C.
7-646-3
Jarry N.
Clezar G.
7-626-4
Q2
Clezar G.
Kubler J.[2]
6-47-5
Ghem A.[5]
Garin C.
6-46-2
Jarry N.
De Paula F.[8]
6-12-67-64
Olivo R.
Ungur A.[3]
6-41-66-3
Lindell C.
Cervantes Huegun I.
6-726-46-2
Londero J.
Endara I.
6-43-66-2
Carballes Baena R.[6]
Lama G.
6-36-4
Melzer G.[4]
Brunstrom J.
6-37-64
Q1
Lama G.
Monroe N.
3-66-46-3
Jarry N.
Sakamoto P.
6-47-64
Lindell C.
Becuzzi E.
6-06-1
De Paula F.[8]
Echazu M.
6-16-1
Olivo R.
Galdos S.
3-66-36-2
Carballes Baena R.[6]
Collarini A.
7-53-66-3
Ungur A.[3]
Dellien H.
6-36-4
Endara I.
Trinker B.
7-54-66-3
Melzer G.[4]
Reyes Varela M.
6-46-4
Kubler J.[2]
Marach O.
6-26-4
Cervantes Huegun I.
Ymer E.[7]
6-46-4
Garin C.
Demoliner M.
6-16-4
Ghem A.[5]
Monteiro T.
7-656-4
Clezar G.
Makiguchi R.
6-35-76-4
Brunstrom J.
Bernardi P.
6-46-4
Londero J.
De Bakker T.[1]
6-46-3