Nicolas Jarry vs Juan Pablo Ficovich — Montevideo CH Round of 16

Montevideo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Nicolas Jarry
CHI5
Nicolas Jarry
#764ATP
1648ELO
1642Clay ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 November 2014
clay
Juan Pablo Ficovich
ARG
Juan Pablo Ficovich
#224ATP
1415ELO
1383Clay ELO
$100kYTD
$984kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Jarry N.
6-4 6-2
Ficovich J.
Jarry N.
662
Ficovich J.
420

Nicolas Jarry defeated Juan Pablo Ficovich 6-4 6-2 in the Montevideo CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jarry N.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ficovich J.

Ficovich J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jarry N.Ficovich J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
62%
Return points won·Even
34%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.9
4.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jarry N.Ficovich J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
48
16
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
76
Break points won·Slight edge
4
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
27
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Jarry N.Ficovich J.
Freshness·
—
86

Ficovich J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Cuevas P.[1]
Dellien H.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Dellien H.
Arguello F.[3]
1-66-06-4
Cuevas P.[1]
Cachin P.[8]
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Cuevas P.[1]
Jarry N.[5]
7-646-4
Dellien H.
Samper Montana J.[6]
6-736-26-1
Arguello F.[3]
Molteni A.[7]
6-47-5
Cachin P.[8]
Quinzi G.
7-676-4
R16
Cachin P.[8]
Trungelliti M.
2-67-656-4
Arguello F.[3]
Bourgue M.
6-36-4
Dellien H.
Pini S.
6-36-2
Quinzi G.
Lipovsek Puches T.
7-626-2
Molteni A.[7]
Coria F.
6-37-5
Samper Montana J.[6]
Olivo R.
6-44-66-3
Jarry N.[5]
Ficovich J.
6-46-2
Cuevas P.[1]
Senattore R.
6-16-3
R32
Pini S.
Barros M.
6-12-0
Cuevas P.[1]
Makiguchi R.
6-46-1
Dellien H.
Riba P.[2]
6-23-0
Senattore R.
Maresca S.
6-17-63
Olivo R.
Behar A.
6-26-4
Trungelliti M.
Volfson D.
4-66-26-1
Molteni A.[7]
Cuevas M.
7-57-66
Cachin P.[8]
Sorgi J.
5-76-36-2
Jarry N.[5]
Leite W.
6-46-2
Ficovich J.
Miele A.
6-46-0
Samper Montana J.[6]
Ameal J.
3-66-36-1
Bourgue M.
Kicker N.
6-33-66-4
Quinzi G.
Lama G.[4]
6-786-46-1
Coria F.
Buchhass M.
6-14-66-1
Arguello F.[3]
Doria L.
6-16-3
Lipovsek Puches T.
Vinicius Dias M.
6-26-1